Trade scenario @11

Beastmode · 04-17-2017, 04:43 PM

Pats it would seem would want to ditch Garropolo, makes no sense to hang on to him. They could rake it in right now. I suspect they are holding the line as long as they can.

hagan714 · 04-17-2017, 04:45 PM

Originally Posted by Beastmode

Pats it would seem would want to ditch Garropolo, makes no sense to hang on to him. They could rake it in right now. I suspect they are holding the line as long as they can.

Garropolo is the safety blanket for Tom. The pats really like this kid. So unless your willing to pay big time for him he is not going any where. 1st rounders only and then some

Originally Posted by shawnkytonk

Not when they could get Garropolo much cheaper.

Think about the trade. there is not a cheaper way out of it for them.

This or fork over as much as their second 2nd pick (52 Cle 308) or the top 3rd

That is some talent lost for a talent hungry team

ChrisXVI · 04-17-2017, 04:49 PM

Mickey's mantra...

shawnkytonk · 04-17-2017, 04:55 PM

Pats have asked for a 1st for Jimmy and no takers thus far.

Beastmode · 04-17-2017, 05:06 PM

Originally Posted by shawnkytonk

Pats have asked for a 1st for Jimmy and no takers thus far.

Because all the QB's they have cashed out did squat (most do). And he does not have to stay there next year so no guarantee if Brady is still there which he likely will be. They also have another decent QB. I think this trade happens but not for a top 3 pick. I don't think this book is closed yet.

shawnkytonk · 04-17-2017, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by Beastmode

Because all the QB's they have cashed out did squat (most do). And he does not have to stay there next year so no guarantee if Brady is still there which he likely will be. They also have another decent QB. I think this trade happens but not for a top 3 pick. I don't think this book is closed yet.

I could see it happening as well. I just don't see what others are saying in that Jimmy would yield more than a first. I think if the Pats had already been offered a late first, they would have jumped on it. Especially since they invested a late second on him.

Seer1 · 04-17-2017, 06:07 PM

Originally Posted by shawnkytonk

I could see it happening as well. I just don't see what others are saying in that Jimmy would yield more than a first. I think if the Pats had already been offered a late first, they would have jumped on it. Especially since they invested a late second on him.

No way Bill settles for just one pick. One and three and...?

shawnkytonk · 04-17-2017, 06:17 PM

Originally Posted by Seer1

No way Bill settles for just one pick. One and three and...?

How do you figure? Jimmy isn't a proven franchise QB. Why give up more when you can draft one. He traded Chandler Jones for a 3rd. He traded Collins for a 4th. Both proven commodities. You're not using logic here.

Seer1 · 04-17-2017, 07:24 PM

Look, you're trying to bring rationality to a seller's market in a year of crappy draft choices. G is much more a proven QB than anything in the first round of the draft. Bill will be happier to keep him than go find another backup. Hence whoever wants him is going to have to make it worth his while. He's not looking at he gave a 50 pick for him so getting a forty is totally worthwhile. Bill'll be looking the other team's GM in the eye while pulling out that GM's wallet and seeing how much is in it. There are some really frightened (especially the Browns) teams out there. It's win-win time for the Pats.

shawnkytonk · 04-17-2017, 07:28 PM

Then I'm sure he'll stay with the Pats.

04-17-2017, 04:43 PM	#11
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Re: Trade scenario @11 Pats it would seem would want to ditch Garropolo, makes no sense to hang on to him. They could rake it in right now. I suspect they are holding the line as long as they can.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

04-17-2017, 04:45 PM	#12
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: Trade scenario @11 Originally Posted by Beastmode Pats it would seem would want to ditch Garropolo, makes no sense to hang on to him. They could rake it in right now. I suspect they are holding the line as long as they can. Garropolo is the safety blanket for Tom. The pats really like this kid. So unless your willing to pay big time for him he is not going any where. 1st rounders only and then some Originally Posted by shawnkytonk Not when they could get Garropolo much cheaper. Think about the trade. there is not a cheaper way out of it for them. This or fork over as much as their second 2nd pick (52 Cle 308) or the top 3rd That is some talent lost for a talent hungry team

04-17-2017, 04:49 PM	#13
ChrisXVI 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 11,482	Re: Trade scenario @11 Mickey's mantra... hagan714 and jeanpierre like this.

04-17-2017, 04:55 PM	#14
shawnkytonk 500th Post Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Denver>Memphis>Mississippi Posts: 736	Re: Trade scenario @11 Pats have asked for a 1st for Jimmy and no takers thus far.

04-17-2017, 05:06 PM	#15
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Re: Trade scenario @11 Originally Posted by shawnkytonk Pats have asked for a 1st for Jimmy and no takers thus far. Because all the QB's they have cashed out did squat (most do). And he does not have to stay there next year so no guarantee if Brady is still there which he likely will be. They also have another decent QB. I think this trade happens but not for a top 3 pick. I don't think this book is closed yet.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

04-17-2017, 05:09 PM	#16
shawnkytonk 500th Post Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Denver>Memphis>Mississippi Posts: 736	Re: Trade scenario @11 Originally Posted by Beastmode Because all the QB's they have cashed out did squat (most do). And he does not have to stay there next year so no guarantee if Brady is still there which he likely will be. They also have another decent QB. I think this trade happens but not for a top 3 pick. I don't think this book is closed yet. I could see it happening as well. I just don't see what others are saying in that Jimmy would yield more than a first. I think if the Pats had already been offered a late first, they would have jumped on it. Especially since they invested a late second on him.

04-17-2017, 06:07 PM	#17
Seer1 Site Donor Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Bayou Bayfield CO Posts: 4,722	Re: Trade scenario @11 Originally Posted by shawnkytonk I could see it happening as well. I just don't see what others are saying in that Jimmy would yield more than a first. I think if the Pats had already been offered a late first, they would have jumped on it. Especially since they invested a late second on him. No way Bill settles for just one pick. One and three and...?

04-17-2017, 06:17 PM	#18
shawnkytonk 500th Post Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Denver>Memphis>Mississippi Posts: 736	Re: Trade scenario @11 Originally Posted by Seer1 No way Bill settles for just one pick. One and three and...? How do you figure? Jimmy isn't a proven franchise QB. Why give up more when you can draft one. He traded Chandler Jones for a 3rd. He traded Collins for a 4th. Both proven commodities. You're not using logic here.

04-17-2017, 07:24 PM	#19
Seer1 Site Donor Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Bayou Bayfield CO Posts: 4,722	Re: Trade scenario @11 Look, you're trying to bring rationality to a seller's market in a year of crappy draft choices. G is much more a proven QB than anything in the first round of the draft. Bill will be happier to keep him than go find another backup. Hence whoever wants him is going to have to make it worth his while. He's not looking at he gave a 50 pick for him so getting a forty is totally worthwhile. Bill'll be looking the other team's GM in the eye while pulling out that GM's wallet and seeing how much is in it. There are some really frightened (especially the Browns) teams out there. It's win-win time for the Pats.
	; Your story isn't over yet ;

04-17-2017, 07:28 PM	#20
shawnkytonk 500th Post Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Denver>Memphis>Mississippi Posts: 736	Re: Trade scenario @11 Then I'm sure he'll stay with the Pats.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82426-trade-scenario-11-a.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	04-17-2017 10:59 AM	18
Trade scenario @11	This thread	Refback	04-17-2017 10:57 AM	3