Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no

05-22-2017, 01:14 AM

It's highly unlikely Streiff loses his job. Save this statement for the preseason.

I wanted him to lose the job last year especially after he threw shade at the former oline coach blaming his struggles on that rather than decline. He didn't lose it.

AsylumGuido · 05-22-2017, 07:59 AM

Originally Posted by WillSaints81

It's highly unlikely Streiff loses his job. Save this statement for the preseason.

I wanted him to lose the job last year especially after he threw shade at the former oline coach blaming his struggles on that rather than decline. He didn't lose it.

Exactly where did Strief (learn to spell OUR player's names correctly) "throw shade" at Bret Ingalls? Was that some of the bullcrap that was twisted by a web blogging hack?

Strief said in an interview after Ingalls was replaced ...

"Anytime you switch offensive line coaches, there's a lot of ways to do it, and I think they all have kind of fundamental differences from each other in the same way that Coach Marrone was different than Kromer who was different than Bret," Strief said. "Sometimes there's fit issues. Coaches like to do things a certain way and maybe he doesn't want the guys that are vested doing that. And I don't know that was the case with Bret, but I think some of the stuff we did with Bret was a little bit different than what we were used to, just some technique stuff that was different, some theories ...

"I think Dan is closer to the norm and what guys were used to. Again, we haven't put pads on and we'll see if that helps at all. I know that just having a fresh message was good for guys."

Referencing that statement the web hack, Larry Larmeu, posted the following tweet ...

Larry @LarryLarmeu
Sounds like Strief is basically saying "glad we fired the old OL coach because he was weird and it didn't go well." https://twitter.com/Kat_Terrell/stat...52637846298624 …
2:25 PM - 17 May 2016

Once again, get your facts straight, or better yet, actually use facts for a change.

|Mitch| · 05-22-2017, 08:24 AM

Will; I have a quote you may want to heed: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt "

WillSaints81 · 05-22-2017, 09:11 AM

Okay, what i said about Streiff is somewhat accurate. It was on SR last year around this time, I think it was ESJ that brought it up. He said the Streiff said the oline had problems with Kromer's replacement and the scheme did not accomodate them or something among those lines.

AsylumGuido · 05-22-2017, 09:29 AM

Originally Posted by WillSaints81

Okay, what i said about Streiff is somewhat accurate. It was on SR last year around this time, I think it was ESJ that brought it up. He said the Streiff said the oline had problems with Kromer's replacement and the scheme did not accomodate them or something among those lines.

Once again, the name is Strief. Secondly, I found the thread you are talking about on SR right here.

The OP referenced the exact quote I posted and also posted the misguided tweet by Larmeu. Then a couple of idiots on the site started blasting Strief based upon what Larmeu posted, not on what was ACTUALLY said. People, like you obviously, who are too lazy to spend the time to read the actual quotes are the problem.

So, no, you were not "somewhat accurate". You were completely wrong ... again. You stated that you wanted him to lose his job because he "threw shade" at Ingalls. All he did was make an intelligent statement based upon facts, something you appear to fail at on a regular basis.

Seer1 · 05-22-2017, 09:52 AM

I have found the ignore list to be very useful. Been a long time since a middle schooler got under my skin like that. I'm all better now.

Rugby Saint II · 05-22-2017, 11:11 AM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Once again, the name is Strief. Secondly, I found the thread you are talking about on SR right here.

The OP referenced the exact quote I posted and also posted the misguided tweet by Larmeu. Then a couple of idiots on the site started blasting Strief based upon what Larmeu posted, not on what was ACTUALLY said. People, like you obviously, who are too lazy to spend the time to read the actual quotes are the problem.

So, no, you were not "somewhat accurate". You were completely wrong ... again. You stated that you wanted him to lose his job because he "threw shade" at Ingalls. All he did was make an intelligent statement based upon facts, something you appear to fail at on a regular basis.

Dayum son!!! Tell it like it is!!!

RaginCajun83 · 05-22-2017, 12:47 PM

I dont care if it helps your case or not BUT keep that pollution off this website

foreverfan · 05-22-2017, 01:23 PM

Originally Posted by RaginCajun83

That my friend is a call and a raise if I ever saw one

Well... you reminded me that this thread really has only one topic worth discussing...

44Champs · 05-22-2017, 10:45 PM

Not the coverage, but the O Line protection is what determines Brees' efficiency

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

05-22-2017, 01:14 AM	#11
Threaded by WillSaints81 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 4,267 Rating: (0 votes - average) It's highly unlikely Streiff loses his job. Save this statement for the preseason. I wanted him to lose the job last year especially after he threw shade at the former oline coach blaming his struggles on that rather than decline. He didn't lose it.
Views: 3897

05-22-2017, 07:59 AM	#12
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 24,392	Re: Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no Originally Posted by WillSaints81 It's highly unlikely Streiff loses his job. Save this statement for the preseason. I wanted him to lose the job last year especially after he threw shade at the former oline coach blaming his struggles on that rather than decline. He didn't lose it. Exactly where did Strief (learn to spell OUR player's names correctly) "throw shade" at Bret Ingalls? Was that some of the bullcrap that was twisted by a web blogging hack? Strief said in an interview after Ingalls was replaced ... "Anytime you switch offensive line coaches, there's a lot of ways to do it, and I think they all have kind of fundamental differences from each other in the same way that Coach Marrone was different than Kromer who was different than Bret," Strief said. "Sometimes there's fit issues. Coaches like to do things a certain way and maybe he doesn't want the guys that are vested doing that. And I don't know that was the case with Bret, but I think some of the stuff we did with Bret was a little bit different than what we were used to, just some technique stuff that was different, some theories ... "I think Dan is closer to the norm and what guys were used to. Again, we haven't put pads on and we'll see if that helps at all. I know that just having a fresh message was good for guys." Referencing that statement the web hack, Larry Larmeu, posted the following tweet ... Larry @LarryLarmeu Sounds like Strief is basically saying "glad we fired the old OL coach because he was weird and it didn't go well." https://twitter.com/Kat_Terrell/stat...52637846298624 … 2:25 PM - 17 May 2016 Once again, get your facts straight, or better yet, actually use facts for a change. foreverfan and Rugby Saint II like this.

05-22-2017, 08:24 AM	#13
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no Will; I have a quote you may want to heed: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt " Rugby Saint II and WW_Who_Dat like this.

05-22-2017, 09:11 AM	#14
WillSaints81 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 4,267	Re: Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no Okay, what i said about Streiff is somewhat accurate. It was on SR last year around this time, I think it was ESJ that brought it up. He said the Streiff said the oline had problems with Kromer's replacement and the scheme did not accomodate them or something among those lines.

05-22-2017, 09:29 AM	#15
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 24,392	Re: Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no Originally Posted by WillSaints81 Okay, what i said about Streiff is somewhat accurate. It was on SR last year around this time, I think it was ESJ that brought it up. He said the Streiff said the oline had problems with Kromer's replacement and the scheme did not accomodate them or something among those lines. Once again, the name is Strief. Secondly, I found the thread you are talking about on SR right here. The OP referenced the exact quote I posted and also posted the misguided tweet by Larmeu. Then a couple of idiots on the site started blasting Strief based upon what Larmeu posted, not on what was ACTUALLY said. People, like you obviously, who are too lazy to spend the time to read the actual quotes are the problem. So, no, you were not "somewhat accurate". You were completely wrong ... again. You stated that you wanted him to lose his job because he "threw shade" at Ingalls. All he did was make an intelligent statement based upon facts, something you appear to fail at on a regular basis. SaintFanInATLHELL and Rugby Saint II like this.
	“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

05-22-2017, 09:52 AM	#16
Seer1 Site Donor Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Bayou Bayfield CO Posts: 4,722	Re: Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no I have found the ignore list to be very useful. Been a long time since a middle schooler got under my skin like that. I'm all better now.

05-22-2017, 11:11 AM	#17
Rugby Saint II Bounty Money $$$ Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA. Posts: 23,725	Re: Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Once again, the name is Strief. Secondly, I found the thread you are talking about on SR right here. The OP referenced the exact quote I posted and also posted the misguided tweet by Larmeu. Then a couple of idiots on the site started blasting Strief based upon what Larmeu posted, not on what was ACTUALLY said. People, like you obviously, who are too lazy to spend the time to read the actual quotes are the problem. So, no, you were not "somewhat accurate". You were completely wrong ... again. You stated that you wanted him to lose his job because he "threw shade" at Ingalls. All he did was make an intelligent statement based upon facts, something you appear to fail at on a regular basis. Dayum son!!! Tell it like it is!!!

05-22-2017, 12:47 PM	#18
RaginCajun83 Hou Saints Fan Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Houston, Tx Posts: 5,050	Re: Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no I dont care if it helps your case or not BUT keep that pollution off this website

05-22-2017, 01:23 PM	#19
foreverfan 12,000 BS Posts Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Metairie, LA Posts: 13,457 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no Originally Posted by RaginCajun83 That my friend is a call and a raise if I ever saw one Well... you reminded me that this thread really has only one topic worth discussing... SmashMouth and RaginCajun83 like this.

05-22-2017, 10:45 PM	#20
44Champs Site Donor Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 2,589	Re: Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no Not the coverage, but the O Line protection is what determines Brees' efficiency Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
44Champs Site Donor Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 2,589

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82821-underhill-there-defensive-coverage-drew-brees-cant-succeed-against-short-answers-no.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Black and Gold \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	05-21-2017 03:33 PM	1
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	05-20-2017 10:15 PM	10
Underhill: Is there a defensive coverage Drew Brees can't succeed against? The short answers is no	This thread	Refback	05-20-2017 10:15 PM	3