x
 

nm

Re: x
 

Somehow still more coherent than a typical willsaints thread.

Re: x
 

Hmmm....that was rather shallow and pedantic...and I learned absolutely nothing!!!

Re: x
 

Ok this is the 2nd tread Danno....

Did Danno have a stroke?

Re: x
 

This thread has potential. I can see it reaching 10 pages lol.

Re: x
 

Well maybe.... LSU IS in the CWS championship game.:confused:

Re: x
 

Plenty of draft choices to be ignored from that one.

Re: x
 

Why all the venomous negativity? Brees will play another 5 years!

Re: x
 

The posts on this thread are why I love this sight.
You guys are great, you guys suck, and you guys are in the middle. I agree with all three of y'all

Re: x
 

At least!

Re: x
 

Re: x
 

I figured one of three things happened....

1. Danno was so drunk he couldn't think of anything to make a thread.

2. Danno was so bored that he couldn't think of anything to make a thread.

3. Danno completely lost his mind, was staring at the computer screen with a twitchy eye and drool coming out the corner of his mouth...obviously he slipped into insanity and being so, was incapable of making a complete thread.

It ended up being his way to get people to post boobs. Which isn't a bad thing.

Re: x
 

Don't you like the fact that a great many of my post suck? :lol:
Great to see some of you have the balls and have finally caught on.









Nothing to see here... Just keep on reading... Move along folks...

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5OqGPM2jGTc/hqdefault.jpg

Re: x
 

Re: x
 

So I just clicked on the second page of this thread and I am now in trouble at work...

Re: x
 

Well duh! It was rated X right up front....

Re: x
 

Tell them you are watching a heavily policed thread...

https://i3.fuskator.com/large/gWGWSJ...-Uniform-4.jpg

Re: x
 

Dude you live in Sweden. I thought this was normal there. I thought Sweden was where the women flow like the salmon of Capistrano.

Re: x
 

I wonder if this is one of Curtis Johnsons receiving drills?:doh:

Re: x
 

That just doesn't sound right for some reason...

Re: x
 

Secret boob thread..nice. Lets go!

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/...an1/image6.jpg

Re: x
 

It must get crowded in Capistrano with all those salmon joining the normal migration of swallows.

Re: x
 

Re: x
 

my new GF is Swedish...and thats why Im too busy to post now.

Re: x
 

Surely you meant 'Y'?

Re: x
 

I agree man F@ck that x nm sh1t. So tired of hearing that all the time in forum. Mn all the way, great post. :bng:

Re: x
 

No cat or fruit eating video! Total trash thread!!!

Re: x
 

My friend, you have shown your true colours. Mn is nuthin' man! Give me nm any day of the week. And you can take that to the bank. ��

Re: x
 

The hell you say! Nm is why we went 7-9 for three years runnin'!

Re: x
 

Don't forget four out of the last five! :clown:

Re: x
 

Are you serious man, really nm!? What kind of crazy talk is that. You know all the stats say mn has more number thingys than nm ever will. This nm talk has gotten out of hand in forum. Mn forever pal !:bng:

Re: x
 

Yeah nm ruined our season. Can't believe people still think nm is not the problem.

Re: x
 

I really like the post; straight. to the point and short.

Re: x
 

Nm was a trier. At least, more than Mn. And it was xv that ruined our season, in case you forgot. What a hot mess xv was. Glad it's gone.

Re: x
 

Still can't get over the Saints using a fifth round pick on a punter, get over it.

Re: x
 

Re: x
 

Oh please saintgup mn showed the lack of blocking and yac. Mn with the lack of Cga and I do agree vx according to pro football.com and the stats at T shows clearly the though nm caused problems but mn + vx account for the T stats being so bad. Get some football sense man. But the vx is dead on ,glad that's gone.

Re: x
 

But... YX?

Re: x
 

Oh...don't even get me started on him!!!

Re: x
 

Without XY, half of us wouldn't even be here!


Think about it....