Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

on mccarthy

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; knowing our luck, we\'d get rid of AB to SanFran and he\'d blow up. Prob take em to the super bowl. Thats just our luck as NO fans. lol...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2005, 11:45 AM   #11
100th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 145
on mccarthy

knowing our luck, we\'d get rid of AB to SanFran and he\'d blow up. Prob take em to the super bowl. Thats just our luck as NO fans. lol
natedogg02 is offline  
Latest Blogs
2015 Saints Bye Week Draft Last Blog: 10-16-2014 By: hagan714


"IRONY" Last Blog: 10-01-2014 By: teddybarexxx


Sainity Zone 9-30-14 Hail Last Blog: 09-30-2014 By: xan


Old 03-31-2005, 03:27 PM   #12
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 591
on mccarthy

Funny how some people are quick to give AB the credit for 2002 but give him a pass on 2004. You have to take the good with the bad.
GoldenTomb is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 03:29 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
on mccarthy

Funny how some people are quick to give AB the credit for 2002 but give him a pass on 2004. You have to take the good with the bad.
Who gave AB the credit? Not me. I just said he was our QB. If he was our QB and we led the NFC in scoring in 2002 then he sure has regressed.

It\'s funny how some give AB all the blame but never any of the credit?
GumboBC is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 03:37 PM   #14
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 591
on mccarthy

I wasn\'t necessarily talking about you, just people.

But see that\'s just it. He was a part of their success in 2002 and a part of their failure in 2004. Just as I would praise him and give him credit in 2002(which I did)I will hold him accountable for 2004. But you are right....some people are horribly one-sided.
GoldenTomb is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 03:41 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
on mccarthy

I wasn\'t necessarily talking about you, just people.

But see that\'s just it. He was a part of their success in 2002 and a part of their failure in 2004. Just as I would praise him and give him credit in 2002(which I did)I will hold him accountable for 2004. But you are right....some people are horribly one-sided.
I give Brooks no more credit for the sucess in 2002 than I do the blame in 2004. Brooks had a better O-line in 2002 and had much longer in the pocket.

So ... much of the credit for 2002 goes to the supporting cast and much of the blame in 2004 goes to the supporting cast.

Of course, Brooks shares some blame and deserves some credit.

My 2 cents in the nickel

[Edited on 31/3/2005 by GumboBC]
GumboBC is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 03:54 PM   #16
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 591
on mccarthy

Fair enough...until we see another inverted pass.
GoldenTomb is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 07:14 PM   #17
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,821
on mccarthy

fire venturi please explaine to me how last year jake was average and the team good. they were plagued with injuries. it is tough to see the quality in brooks when he throws the ball backwards and once again dives for a touchdown and ooops forgot the ball. i am with you on the line. i saw him at times have no time to throw. then i saw him at times still make bad plays. really bad plays. i used to support the guy until his stupid comments. because the sad truth is jake is a better qb right now. had a lot less talent last year to work with and was better. jakes not as talented just more intelligent.

If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score?
Lombardi
spkb25 is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 12:47 AM   #18
100th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA.
Posts: 216
on mccarthy

First of all, why do you think that we had way more talent than the Panthers? Yes, Jake\'s numbers were a little better. If Davis and Foster played all year his numbers would be the same as they were last year, about average. Receivers are about equal when you compare their stats. They didn\'t know what they had in Muhsin Muhammad until he made some spectactular catches and they saw that he could go up and get the ball on anyone. Their 3rd RB was just a effective as Deuce and had 4 less fumbles. O-line gave Jake more time and less sacks. Of couse the D was better than ours. So what else is there?
Rsanders24 is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 07:29 AM   #19
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,821
on mccarthy

im sorry are they the words i used. that we had \" way better talent then the panthers last year\". no i dont believe i said that at all. what i did say is dont tell me how brooks play on an average team and he is a good qb while jake plays on a good team and is average. his team was beat up last year and he still went out and performed. what brooks would have done is cryed about how great he is. hey i think brooks is a pretty good qb. he could be even better. i did see brooks last year make some really bad plays. you dont make those type of plays year in and year out and talk about how good you are. this isnt a judgement of talent. i dont see really good qb\'s make those types of plays as often as brooks. matter of fact i dont see anyone do that. i dont think brooks can really consider himself a good qb until he can rememeber to bring the ball with him when he dives over the goal line. but this wasnt set up as a brooks bashing thread or another brooks verse jake thread. so if you want to post back you can but i dont want to argue it anymore. ill read what you post back though.

If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score?
Lombardi
spkb25 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts