Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; ...I just wanted to stir the pot ... or a waste of time with no meaningful discourse...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2005, 12:39 PM   #31
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning

...I just wanted to stir the pot ...
or a waste of time with no meaningful discourse
LKelley67 is offline  
Latest Blogs
Saints: A glimpse of the future Last Blog: 11-19-2014 By: lee909


What i tell you ! !! ! Last Blog: 11-02-2014 By: SAINTstunna


MID TERM ELECTION Last Blog: 10-29-2014 By: teddybarexxx


Old 04-08-2005, 04:15 PM   #32
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning

...I just wanted to stir the pot ...
or a waste of time with no meaningful discourse
How \'bout I write a post on the past 37-year history of the Saints and dwell on all of the negatives?

Oh, yeah ... I forgot ... you do that on a daily basis.

No need for me to do it.
GumboBC is offline  
Old 04-08-2005, 04:45 PM   #33
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning

I have a challenge for you Billy.

Without belittling other Saints players - show me why AB is a good QB. Can you do that?
WhoDat is offline  
Old 04-08-2005, 05:16 PM   #34
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning

I have a challenge for you Billy.

Without belittling other Saints players - show me why AB is a good QB. Can you do that?
1. Brooks won the only playoff game in club history.
2. Our offense was the 2nd highest scoring in the NFC in 2002.
3. 24TDs/8Ints in 2003.

GumboBC is offline  
Old 04-08-2005, 05:37 PM   #35
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning

1. TEAM STAT
2. TEAM STAT

Both of those are irrelevant b/c they relate to the team, not Brooks. Remember - you\'re the guy who says that QBs don\'t individually deserve credit or blame for those types of things.

3. Yep - that was a good year throwing the ball. He also finished 8th in QB rating that year. Pretty darn respectible. Here are a few more stats related to that:

2003 - AB led the league in fumbles lost - that kind of undermines the low INT rate, don\'t you think?

Aside from his 8th place finish in 2003 in QB rating, he has finished 20th, 20th, and 19th. So does one \"good\" year in four make up for the three other \"below average\" years?

[Edited on 8/4/2005 by WhoDat]

\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. That’s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans Saints’ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse


\"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\"
he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"
WhoDat is offline  
Old 04-09-2005, 02:11 AM   #36
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning

c\'mon whodat why do you have to look at four years starting. 2003 alone was the true indicator. the other years there were bad receivers or bad line or bad play calling, etc. and you don\'t call averaging 17th is passer rating out of a 32 team league elite? you\'re looking at the wrong stats buddy.
LKelley67 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts