OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD

tiggerpolice · 05-20-2005, 12:16 PM

WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK OUR TEAMS RECORD WILL BE THIS SEASON?

PLEASE VOTE & EXPLAIN YOUR DECISION.........

tiggerpolice · 05-20-2005, 12:23 PM

I THINK WITH OUR O-LINE WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO CONTROL THE BALL...KEEPING OUR D OFF FIELD....AND WITH THAT EXTRA REST OUR D SHOULD BE ABLE TO PLAY AT A HIGH LEVEL LONGER.....ALSO MOST OF THE TEAMS WITHIN OUR SCHEDULE THIS SEASON ARE A LITTLE WEAK ON OFFENSE OR IN THE PROCESS OF BUILDING THEIR TEAM.....THIS COULD BE A GOOD YEAR FOR US......

o1higuy · 05-20-2005, 12:29 PM

I think 10-6 is realistic given the parity in the NFC. I truly feel we have some of the most talented players at the skill positions in the NFC. It will be interesting to watch. I hope this turns out to be the case. I think if the new run first philosiphy works out, this will also help out our defense. When you constantly are 3 and out and cannot score in the first quarter, a lot of pressure is put on the defense. When your defensive talent is maybe just above mediocre, that will make them look horrible.

-RVD- · 05-20-2005, 12:34 PM

12 - 4

If they don't let wins go to their head, 16-0.

ScottyRo · 05-20-2005, 12:43 PM

9-7. It's hard to really say the team is going to be that much better without them having entered camp or anything. Let's see how the new offense playbook works out before we get too excited.

WhoDat · 05-20-2005, 02:08 PM

The correct answer is 8-8, until they prove otherwise.

Danno · 05-20-2005, 02:37 PM

Can't the exact same thing be said about every NFL team? They are what they are until they prove otherwise? Thats no fun, and its incorrect. Changes have been made, we play different teams, coaching philosophy has changed, other teams change.
Based on what I've seen us do, what other teams have done, our schedule, our coaching changes, our team chemistry, our late season success, I'd say barring injuries we should win anywhere from 9 to 11 games.
let me rephrase that. On paper this team looks like a 10-6 team plus/minus a game.

I'll say 10-6, until they prove otherwise.

no_cloning · 05-20-2005, 03:28 PM

Pretty tough schedule ... they'll have to go 4-2 in the division to even get to 8-8 ... I agree with Danno: On paper this team (the players) looks like a 10-6 team ... Coaching staff is good for 2 extra losses ... 8-8 again.

Danno · 05-20-2005, 03:52 PM

Originally Posted by no_cloning

Pretty tough schedule ... they'll have to go 4-2 in the division to even get to 8-8 ... I agree with Danno: On paper this team (the players) looks like a 10-6 team ... Coaching staff is good for 2 extra losses ... 8-8 again.

So you're saying we'll lose 6 of these 10?
NYG
STL
CHI
DET
GB
MIN
NE
NYJ
BUF
MIA

I don't see it that way.
5 we should be favored in
3 we should be dogs
2 should be a pick'em.

saintswhodi · 05-20-2005, 04:10 PM

So you're saying we'll lose 6 of these 10?
NYG
STL
CHI
DET
GB
MIN
NE
NYJ
BUF
MIA

BUF toss up(probable loss), NYJ loss, NE loss, Min loss, GB loss, And I give us a chance to lose at least one of the four between STL, NYG, CHI, and DET. That would be 6 losses out of those 10. And Mia won't be a breeze either, new coach, stud RB, bad ass defense.

05-20-2005, 12:16 PM	#1
tiggerpolice 500th Post Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: new orleans Posts: 584	OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK OUR TEAMS RECORD WILL BE THIS SEASON? PLEASE VOTE & EXPLAIN YOUR DECISION.........

05-20-2005, 12:23 PM	#2
tiggerpolice 500th Post Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: new orleans Posts: 584	RE: OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD I THINK WITH OUR O-LINE WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO CONTROL THE BALL...KEEPING OUR D OFF FIELD....AND WITH THAT EXTRA REST OUR D SHOULD BE ABLE TO PLAY AT A HIGH LEVEL LONGER.....ALSO MOST OF THE TEAMS WITHIN OUR SCHEDULE THIS SEASON ARE A LITTLE WEAK ON OFFENSE OR IN THE PROCESS OF BUILDING THEIR TEAM.....THIS COULD BE A GOOD YEAR FOR US......

05-20-2005, 12:29 PM	#3
o1higuy 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 189	RE: OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD I think 10-6 is realistic given the parity in the NFC. I truly feel we have some of the most talented players at the skill positions in the NFC. It will be interesting to watch. I hope this turns out to be the case. I think if the new run first philosiphy works out, this will also help out our defense. When you constantly are 3 and out and cannot score in the first quarter, a lot of pressure is put on the defense. When your defensive talent is maybe just above mediocre, that will make them look horrible.
o1higuy 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 189

05-20-2005, 12:34 PM	#4
-RVD- Registered Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: New Orleans, Louisiana Posts: 78	RE: OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD 12 - 4 If they don't let wins go to their head, 16-0.

05-20-2005, 12:43 PM	#5
ScottyRo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Williamsburg, VA (ugh, the food here) Posts: 1,704	RE: OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD 9-7. It's hard to really say the team is going to be that much better without them having entered camp or anything. Let's see how the new offense playbook works out before we get too excited.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

05-20-2005, 02:08 PM	#6
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	RE: OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD The correct answer is 8-8, until they prove otherwise.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

05-20-2005, 02:37 PM	#7
Danno Site Donor 2014 Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,640	RE: OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD Can't the exact same thing be said about every NFL team? They are what they are until they prove otherwise? Thats no fun, and its incorrect. Changes have been made, we play different teams, coaching philosophy has changed, other teams change. Based on what I've seen us do, what other teams have done, our schedule, our coaching changes, our team chemistry, our late season success, I'd say barring injuries we should win anywhere from 9 to 11 games. let me rephrase that. On paper this team looks like a 10-6 team plus/minus a game. I'll say 10-6, until they prove otherwise.

05-20-2005, 03:28 PM	#8
no_cloning 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 249	RE: OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD Pretty tough schedule ... they'll have to go 4-2 in the division to even get to 8-8 ... I agree with Danno: On paper this team (the players) looks like a 10-6 team ... Coaching staff is good for 2 extra losses ... 8-8 again.
no_cloning 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 249

05-20-2005, 03:52 PM	#9
Danno Site Donor 2014 Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,640	Re: RE: OUR 2005 TEAM RECORD Originally Posted by no_cloning Pretty tough schedule ... they'll have to go 4-2 in the division to even get to 8-8 ... I agree with Danno: On paper this team (the players) looks like a 10-6 team ... Coaching staff is good for 2 extra losses ... 8-8 again. So you're saying we'll lose 6 of these 10? NYG STL CHI DET GB MIN NE NYJ BUF MIA I don't see it that way. 5 we should be favored in 3 we should be dogs 2 should be a pick'em.

05-20-2005, 04:10 PM	#10
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	So you're saying we'll lose 6 of these 10? NYG STL CHI DET GB MIN NE NYJ BUF MIA BUF toss up(probable loss), NYJ loss, NE loss, Min loss, GB loss, And I give us a chance to lose at least one of the four between STL, NYG, CHI, and DET. That would be 6 losses out of those 10. And Mia won't be a breeze either, new coach, stud RB, bad ass defense.