Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

Lindy's Rating The Teams

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; The following chart is a compilation of the position ratings for each team that were included in the preview stories. Each unit is rated on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest. Intangibles had a plus ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2005, 07:49 AM   #1
500th Post
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: new orleans
Posts: 584
Lindy's Rating The Teams

The following chart is a compilation of the position ratings for each team that were included in the preview stories. Each unit is rated on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest. Intangibles had a plus or minus of no more than 2. That figure was added or subtracted from the total of all positions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COACH QB RB REC OL DL LB SEC ST INT TOTAL
NFC EAST
Philadelphia 8.5 8.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 +1 69.5
Dallas 9.0 6.5 6.5 8.0 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 6.0 E 66.5
Washington 8.5 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 -1 65.5
N.Y. Giants 7.5 5.0 7.5 8.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 +2 61.0
NFC North
Green Bay 8.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.0 E 66.0
Minnesota 7.5 8.0 7.5 8.5 7.5 6.0 6.0 7.5 6.0 -1 63.5
Detroit 8.0 6.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 +2 63.0
Chicago 6.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 -2 59.5
NFC South
Carolina 8.0 7.5 8.5 7.5 6.0 10.0 7.5 6.0 7.5 +2 70.5
Atlanta 6.5 7.5 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 +1 65.5
Tampa Bay 8.0 7.0 6.5 7.0 6.0 9.0 8.0 8.5 6.5 -1 65.5
New Orleans 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 -1 63.0
NFC West
St. Louis 7.5 7.5 7.5 9.0 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 +1 68.0
Seattle 8.0 8.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 5.5 7.5 6.5 +2 66.5
Arizona 8.0 6.0 6.5 8.0 7.0 5.5 5.5 6.5 8.0 E 61.0
San Francisco 7.0 5.5 8.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 9.0 7.5 6.0 E 61.0
AFC East
New England 10.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 7.0 +2 70.0
Miami 6.5 6.0 8.0 7.5 6.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 -1 67.0
Buffalo 6.0 7.5 8.0 7.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 +1 64.5
N.Y. Jets 7.0 7.0 7.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.0 6.5 6.5 +2 62.5
AFC North
Baltimore 8.0 5.5 9.0 6.0 8.5 6.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 +1 68.0
Cincinnati 7.5 6.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 6.0 8.0 +1 65.5
Pittsburgh 8.0 6.5 7.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 E 63.5
Cleveland 7.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 +1 63.0
AFC South
Indianapolis 9.0 9.5 8.5 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 6.0 8.0 -2 69.5
Tennessee 9.0 9.0 6.5 7.5 8.0 7.0 8.5 7.0 7.0 -1 68.5
Houston 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 +1 63.0
Jacksonville 6.0 6.0 9.0 7.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.0 -1 60.5
AFC West
Kansas City 9.0 8.0 9.0 6.5 9.0 6.5 7.0 6.0 7.0 -1 67.0
Denver 8.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 E 65.5
Oakland 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 6.5 7.5 6.5 7.0 9.0 +2 65.5
San Diego 7.0 5.5 10.0 5.5 5.5 6.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 -1 57.5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: QB=Quarterbacks; RB=Running Backs; REC=Wide Receivers/Tight Ends; OL=Offensive Linemen; DL=Defensive Linemen; LB=Linebackers; SEC=Secondary; ST=Special Teams; INT=Intangibles

http://www.lindyssports.com/home/fbpro2.html
tiggerpolice is offline  
Old 06-30-2005, 10:01 AM   #2
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 6,296
Blog Entries: 5
RE: Lindy

I am glad someone sees (like me) we have less talent than all the hype that goes on.
Euphoria is offline  
Old 06-30-2005, 10:11 AM   #3
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
I am glad someone sees (like me) we have less talent than all the hype that goes on.
Um, they have Minnesota ranked about the same as us, when they are clearly better. They gave Tom Brady and 8 at QB, and AB got a 7? If Tom Brady is an 8, AB is a 3, at best. They gave Culpepper the same grade as Brady. They rated McNabb BETTER. Yeah, these guys know what they are talking about. Hell, Trent Green is rated the same as Brady, and Jake Plummer is half a point under. JAKE PLUMMER. Hell, J.P. freaking Losman is only a half point below Brady on this chart, but he is rated better than AB. You may wanna read what's going on more before tossing your hat in with these clowns.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 06-30-2005, 10:45 AM   #4
Got a problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 10,403
Originally Posted by saintswhodi
I am glad someone sees (like me) we have less talent than all the hype that goes on.
Um, they have Minnesota ranked about the same as us, when they are clearly better. They gave Tom Brady and 8 at QB, and AB got a 7? If Tom Brady is an 8, AB is a 3, at best. They gave Culpepper the same grade as Brady. They rated McNabb BETTER. Yeah, these guys know what they are talking about. Hell, Trent Green is rated the same as Brady, and Jake Plummer is half a point under. JAKE PLUMMER. Hell, J.P. freaking Losman is only a half point below Brady on this chart, but he is rated better than AB. You may wanna read what's going on more before tossing your hat in with these clowns.
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner! "[<insert dancing brocolli here>]"
papz is offline  
Old 06-30-2005, 11:47 AM   #5
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
Tom Brady and 8 at QB, and AB got a 7?


That QB in Carolina , I think his name is Jake Delhomme , his rating was 7.5 and Brooks is 7.0.

WhoDat must have not seen this yet ......
saintz08 is offline  
Old 06-30-2005, 08:39 PM   #6
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
Hadn't. Have now. I think that's hilarious.

But I ultimately agree with Whodi. What a freaking sham those ratings are.

Our WRs, which are have been a concern outside of Horn are an 8 but Deuce is a 7. Our D-line ranks as high as our RB??? Get the F out of here.
WhoDat is offline  
Old 07-01-2005, 04:59 PM   #7
Kinder, gentler
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
You missed the fact that the first rating goes to the coach. According to these rankings, Carolina has better running backs and wide receivers than we do.


Yeah, ok.


And can someone explain to me the whole, "this team is not as talented as everyone makes them out to be," mentality that I've been reading on these boards the past few days?
BlackandBlue is offline  
Old 07-02-2005, 09:21 AM   #8
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 1,800
Looks like you killed another thread.
LordOfEntropy is offline  
Old 07-02-2005, 11:26 AM   #9
Cold as Ice!
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Da Big Easy
Posts: 2,978
omg look at what they have our special teams? and rb? they just lost all credibility!
FireVenturi is offline  
Old 07-02-2005, 11:53 AM   #10
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
You missed the fact that the first rating goes to the coach. According to these rankings, Carolina has better running backs and wide receivers than we do.


Yeah, ok.
Sure why not .

Using Saintfan logic .......

All Jake Delhomme does is hand off .......Yet for some reason he throws for more yards then Brooks in the wide open Saint offense .

Now take into consideration , the Saints are 1 high ankle sprain away from no running game . Carolina can pretty much run whom ever and get the yards . Jake has put the ball down the field and had breakout seasons for Smith and Moose and it seems that Carolina has a good receiver waiting to breakout now every year . Saints have Horn and despite his strong year , still underachieved in comparison to Moose . The rest of the Saints receivers are unproven .
saintz08 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts