Backup QB

duece4pres · 07-03-2005, 06:48 AM

I know it is still early, but, who do think will start if Brooks goes down! Will it be McPherson or Bouwman?

papz · 07-03-2005, 10:36 AM

If we are in contention for a playoff spot... Bouman.

If we are sucking and have no chance... McPherson.

RockyMountainSaint · 07-03-2005, 10:49 PM

I remember Bouman coming in a few years ago for Culpepper when Donte' was injured. He lit up two games. The 4-letter network was on his nuts.
I also have seen the pre-season games he has played for us. I haven't been impressed by his performance in those games.
I have seen him perform well and that is what I am holding on to when thinking about Brooks going down. Hope.
Whatever knocks on Brooks anyone wants to bring up; he has been healthy. That could be a by-product of his turning into a total sissy and refusing to run the football... but I digress.
We have no idea what our backup situation looks like. If only Jake had gotten a fair shot.
Cest La Vie.

spkb25 · 07-03-2005, 11:24 PM

i remember bouwman did real well for minn. one year. i don't know, i can't see him giving us that. he has seemed really bad since then. mcpherson might be better. i am not sure either way but would probably have to give bouwman the nodd for at least one game. if he doesn't do shiit then start mcpherson.

spkb25 · 07-03-2005, 11:33 PM

bouman also

RockyMountainSaint · 07-04-2005, 05:48 AM

I believe that AB is our best option at QB right now.

Excuse me please (sound of me slugging myself in the nuts).

I don't advocate starting a 21 year old QB at this time and Bouman is not the answer either imho. But think of another Saints player that anyone has watched and pulled as much hair out over (i'm nearly bald now) as Aaron Brooks. I wanted to accept him but have been burned too often.

It's like wanting out of a marriage after you found out that it isn't what you really thought you were getting.

Well he is ours.... for better or worse.

bobcat4u2 · 07-04-2005, 06:47 AM

this is my first comment on the qb situation.i still beleive brooks could become a top qb. i feel like the change of co-ordinators (whom i could anticipate correctly 80% of the time could change him.also, i've seen men considered washed up more than him come to life later in career.i am not brooks lover or hater,but please give him a legimate supported last chance for the sake of our team.remember,even peyton makes errors and don't blame brooks for not giving jake the chance he deserved here.(that was poor coaching)

papz · 07-04-2005, 08:51 AM

"Backup"

Euphoria · 07-04-2005, 10:24 AM

I like bouman in our new offense... something he is more suited for.

JKool · 07-04-2005, 10:57 AM

That's a good point Euph.

Bouman is certainly better qualified to hand-off to Duece than he is to throw... just kidding.

Seriously though, I agree that with a more run-centered, power attack, all our QBs will benefit. However, it isn't like the QB was asked to do a lot in our previous offensive scheme. It isn't clear to me what the changes to the playbook are just yet (other than run more) - though that is the kind of thing that will impact who is better suited to play backup.

07-03-2005, 06:48 AM	#1
duece4pres Biloxi Bandit Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: biloxi, ms Posts: 293	Backup QB I know it is still early, but, who do think will start if Brooks goes down! Will it be McPherson or Bouwman?

07-03-2005, 10:36 AM	#2
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,682	RE: Backup QB If we are in contention for a playoff spot... Bouman. If we are sucking and have no chance... McPherson.

07-03-2005, 10:49 PM	#3
RockyMountainSaint Mmm That Smell! Join Date: Oct 1998 Location: Metairie Terrace Posts: 3,073	I remember Bouman coming in a few years ago for Culpepper when Donte' was injured. He lit up two games. The 4-letter network was on his nuts. I also have seen the pre-season games he has played for us. I haven't been impressed by his performance in those games. I have seen him perform well and that is what I am holding on to when thinking about Brooks going down. Hope. Whatever knocks on Brooks anyone wants to bring up; he has been healthy. That could be a by-product of his turning into a total sissy and refusing to run the football... but I digress. We have no idea what our backup situation looks like. If only Jake had gotten a fair shot. Cest La Vie.
	I'm no one. Who are you?

07-04-2005, 05:48 AM	#6
RockyMountainSaint Mmm That Smell! Join Date: Oct 1998 Location: Metairie Terrace Posts: 3,073	I believe that AB is our best option at QB right now. Excuse me please (sound of me slugging myself in the nuts). I don't advocate starting a 21 year old QB at this time and Bouman is not the answer either imho. But think of another Saints player that anyone has watched and pulled as much hair out over (i'm nearly bald now) as Aaron Brooks. I wanted to accept him but have been burned too often. It's like wanting out of a marriage after you found out that it isn't what you really thought you were getting. Well he is ours.... for better or worse.
	I'm no one. Who are you?

07-04-2005, 06:47 AM	#7
bobcat4u2 Registered Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 71	this is my first comment on the qb situation.i still beleive brooks could become a top qb. i feel like the change of co-ordinators (whom i could anticipate correctly 80% of the time could change him.also, i've seen men considered washed up more than him come to life later in career.i am not brooks lover or hater,but please give him a legimate supported last chance for the sake of our team.remember,even peyton makes errors and don't blame brooks for not giving jake the chance he deserved here.(that was poor coaching)
bobcat4u2 Registered Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 71

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

07-03-2005, 11:24 PM	#4
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,057	i remember bouwman did real well for minn. one year. i don't know, i can't see him giving us that. he has seemed really bad since then. mcpherson might be better. i am not sure either way but would probably have to give bouwman the nodd for at least one game. if he doesn't do shiit then start mcpherson.

07-03-2005, 11:33 PM	#5
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,057	bouman also

07-04-2005, 08:51 AM	#8
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,682	"Backup"

07-04-2005, 10:24 AM	#9
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	I like bouman in our new offense... something he is more suited for.

07-04-2005, 10:57 AM	#10
JKool 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 2,423	That's a good point Euph. Bouman is certainly better qualified to hand-off to Duece than he is to throw... just kidding. Seriously though, I agree that with a more run-centered, power attack, all our QBs will benefit. However, it isn't like the QB was asked to do a lot in our previous offensive scheme. It isn't clear to me what the changes to the playbook are just yet (other than run more) - though that is the kind of thing that will impact who is better suited to play backup.