Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints > NFL

Redskins win trademark dispute

this is a discussion within the NFL Community Forum; People throw up frivolous lawsuits all the time. We are joking , but yes, after the Redskins debate, lawsuits, why not some fool say Saints and everything else is against their beliefs , whatever. Christmas in the public school systems ...

Like Tree11Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-2015, 01:54 PM   #1
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,919
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Redskins win trademark dispute

People throw up frivolous lawsuits all the time. We are joking , but yes, after the Redskins debate, lawsuits, why not some fool say Saints and everything else is against their beliefs , whatever.
Christmas in the public school systems is called Winter Break.
Thanksgiving Break is called Fall Break.
Easter Break is called Spring Break.
No prayer in public school systems.
Redskins is against some Native American Indian groups.
A secretary is called an Executive Assistant.
Receptionist is ...Pubic Relations Communications Officer

Whatever. It is all PC stupid.
Rugby Saint II and SloMotion like this.
OldMaid is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 04:52 PM   #2
Merces Letifer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
Re: Redskins win trademark dispute

Originally Posted by OldMaid View Post
People throw up frivolous lawsuits all the time. We are joking , but yes, after the Redskins debate, lawsuits, why not some fool say Saints and everything else is against their beliefs , whatever.
Yeah, whatever.

Christmas in the public school systems is called Winter Break.
Thanksgiving Break is called Fall Break.
Easter Break is called Spring Break.
No prayer in public school systems.
Yes. The government is not, and should not, be in the business of pushing religion in any way, shape, or form. Says so in the U.S. Constitution.

Redskins is against some Native American Indian groups.
Where is Danny Akroyd when you need him... no, "Redskin" is not against some Native American groups. "Redskin" is and has always been a racial slur to describe ANY and ALL Native American. It is just like any other of the racial slurs that come up as asterisks when you type them. Granted, we don't make much if it because we have conveniently placed most Native Americans in reservations.

A secretary is called an Executive Assistant.
Receptionist is ...Pubic Relations Communications Officer
And the complaints dept is now customer service, and the customer is always right, and partly cloudy is now partly sunny... so?
Whatever. It is all PC stupid.
Yeah, whatever.

'Cause the simple man pays the thrills, the bills and the pills that kill
Tobias-Reiper is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 06:07 PM   #3
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
Re: Redskins win trademark dispute

[quote=Tobias-Reiper;687339]Yeah, whatever.
Yes. The government is not, and should not, be in the business of pushing religion in any way, shape, or form. Says so in the U.S. Constitution.

Thats not what the constitution says.

Granted, we don't make much if it because we have conveniently placed most Native Americans in reservations.
We did not "place" them there and no one is forcing them to stay.
Danno is offline  
Old 12-29-2015, 12:37 PM   #4
Merces Letifer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
Re: Redskins win trademark dispute

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper View Post
Yeah, whatever.
Yes. The government is not, and should not, be in the business of pushing religion in any way, shape, or form. Says so in the U.S. Constitution.
Thats not what the constitution says.
Don't take it from me.

" Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties."


We did not "place" them there and no one is forcing them to stay.
Sure... sure ...

'Cause the simple man pays the thrills, the bills and the pills that kill
Tobias-Reiper is offline  
Old 12-29-2015, 06:47 PM   #5
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
Re: Redskins win trademark dispute

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper View Post
Don't take it from me.

" Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties."
So what law did they make?
Danno is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts