|
this is a discussion within the NFL Community Forum; Well, that's a non-starter... Twitter...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Potential Changes in New CBA
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Potential Changes in New CBA
So even millionaires are for socialism?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Potential Changes in New CBA
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Potential Changes in New CBA
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
If one signed for $16mil per year and a 17th game is added, one would be looking for that $1mil game check for Game 17 and not agreeing to capped earnings...![]()
Having a capped earning for redistribution is socialism by definition, if not in end-result practice and application... We saw socialism with the bank bailouts and the auto bailouts; however, other businesses and individuals affected by storms, oil spills, not so much... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Potential Changes in New CBA
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
That player can still get his $1M game check. It simply has to be negotiated.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Potential Changes in New CBA
|
![]() |
![]() |