![]() |
Rankins to J E T S !
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Leaving us 1.4M over and that's not counting Drew retirement hit and we have no practice squad or draft picks signed.
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
It might, however, get us yet another compensatory pick. |
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
Would elevate PJ Williams, Patrick Robinson, or Hurst/Griffin to starters. The last cuts are generally the most painful. Keep in mind that is also the 51 number not the all in number. All in we have to shed: -6.3M To get under cap -4M 6 Draft picks at league minimum - 2M(est) Practice squad Still have -14M to go to start the season 1M-2M in the black. Word is the cap could climb to/past 200M, we desperately need the extra 15M in space that would provide. |
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
Daniel Kaplan, sports business writer: “The salary cap, absent the NFL’s and NFLPA’s agreement to borrow from future years, would have been in the $150 million to $160 million range given the pandemic losses. But knowing the new TV deals will roughly double media income, the sport is comfortable dipping into that future largess to soften the 2021 cap decline. Future caps will rise significantly but will have to take into account this season’s borrowing of future revenue.” https://theathletic.com/news/nfl-set...s/0WCzkKHuwVmQ I’m not as concerned as others may be, with getting under and signing the roster, a very good roster I think also, as much as I am about the upcoming draft. Looks like our lateral freedom to sign any veterans to fill needs are going to be limited. Not only this upcoming season, but possibly the next two as well. Drafting well is always important, but now it feels almost critical. Add in dead money, which is creeping up there and will increase significantly post 6/1, stating the draft is critical is a huge understatement. |
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
Also Brees' cap number against the team this year is $12,225,000 We should see another draft pick as the highest we're likely to spend will be on the other No. 2... |
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
And don't forget how many 1 year deals are going down this year as agents and their free agent players await to see the new cap numbers...
We take our beating this year... |
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
Methodology App. V, §2 lays out the process of calculating the value of CFAs. §2(a) begins the calculation as follows to all players in the league: Start with the Average Per Year (APY) of the contract signed. Subtract from the APY any money that the compensatory formula does not count. Rank these players by adjusted APY in descending order, and assign points to each player, equal to [number of leaguewide players]-[rank]. Add anywhere from 25 to 100 points for players who played a percentage of snaps on offense or defense in the range of 25% to 100%. (Kickers and punters are given a different point addition unrelated to snap counts.) Add 20 or 5 points for postseason honors as determined by the AP’s All Pro list, and the PFWA’s All NFL/All Conference list. 3 Prior to the 2020 CBA, it had been determined that workout bonuses, incentives, and salary escalators were common devices that the compensatory formula does not count. However, App. V, §2(a) of the 2020 CBA makes clear that these devices will now count if they are considered Likely To Be Earned, or are earned in the player’s first season of his new contract. Qualifying CFAs And Assigning Them To A Round Once the Final Numerical Value (FNV) as described above has been tallied, each UFA is given a value that either assigns him as a CFA to a particular round, ranging from the 3rd to the 7th, or does not qualify him as a CFA at all. App. V, §3(b) sets these round cutoffs in a percentile manner, as follows:
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
He sure got paid for for a 3 rd comp.gees that’s a lots of dough for him Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
Look at the formula above. When it comes to incentives they only count in the formula if they are "likely to be earned". Based upon this past season none of the incentives I listed would qualify for the formula. |
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
Quote:
Generally when I post something here I check both Spotrak and Overthecap for the numbers then look for specific names on their roster to see if certain transactions have been accounted for. They both give a (51) and an all in number that accounts for contracts, dead money, carryover etc. I swag practice squad and draft class costs from what i have learned listening to people like Andrew Brandt who an NFL business analyst, and ex VP of the Packers, he is an absolute azzhole but knows his crap. I ignore content from people that make a living making content because they have to speculate to have new content. Drew's retirement is not factored in because that will not hit the books until 1 June to allow the Saints to split the dead money over this and next year reducing the dead hit to 11,325,000. His cap hit until that time at 12,225,000 meaning his retirement will relieve roughly 900k of cap burden for this year. Everyone is looking to be under an absolute number and that is not what is going to happen, Loomis needs to start 2021 with cap cushion to account for injuries requiring us to pick up free agents. According to Andrew that number is generally between 2-4M depending on GM. |
Re: Rankins to J E T S !
There goes a first round draft pick that was only worth a fifth round comp pick.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com