Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

How was Dan Campbell's relationship with Peat? Was he a proponent of the extension? Maybe we could put together a Brock Osweiler type deal that sends Peat to the Lions.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...alex-anzalone/

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

Good luck with that! I mean, seriously. I would hope that they are that stupid.

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

Where do you get his replacement?

SFIAH

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

Same as Analzone. Wherever you would have got his replacement anyway when he got hurt. He has never played 16 games.

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

The benefits of trading Andrus Peat are negative.

As SFIAH advised in a previous post, it will cost more to trade than to keep him.

See overthecap figures below -

https://overthecap.com/player/andrus-peat/3861/

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

That was Nick Easton. He is gone. So, my question still stands.

SFIAH

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

Especially now that the Saints restructured his contract.

SFIAH

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

Just need a Popeyes ban on Peat to keep him away from the chickn sammiches

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

We don’t even want Peat... why the hell would another team?!

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

He came into this past season lean and trim.

https://www.neworleanssaints.com/vid...-training-camp

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

Over the cap says a post june 1 trade of peat would save us 1 million. Thats 1 million that can go to whatever free agent addition will play when peat gets hurt anyway. The Lions wanted Analzone, so I could imagine they could want peat.

Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
 

It also shows a dead money cap hit of $4.6M, if that trade is made.

Dead cap we currently have is over $22.6M. 5th worse in the league..., but that’s without DB#9’s post 6/1 dead money hit which is an additional $12+M. Dead money reduces our current cap ceiling. You make that trade and we’ll be in the neighborhood of a $40M dead money cap reduction, post 6/1. For reference, that’s roughly 22% of our cap ceiling reduced, inclusive of that trade scenario.

I’m just not a fan of reducing my cap by $4.6M to free up $1M immediately.