|
This is a cute way of saying not Aaron Brooks fault everyone. HE is never the problem and you guys should ignore the fact that his turnovers killed us, AGAIN. Or the fact he had a 1.9 rating at one point. Or the fact that he looks totally confused in the pocket. Or the fact that he is still throwing rocket shots over the middle, when the ref had to duck, and Conwell had to dive for the ball instead of a touch pass that would have kept him on his feet and running wide open, or leading Shad Meier into getting blasted, or the NUMEROUS times they showed video clips of receivers being open, and Brooks not seeing them or short hopping lazer shots to them. Noone look at that. Deflect, deflect, deflect. Classic.
|
All that statement goes to prove is that the QB's play is crucial no matter how good the Defense is....you just proved our point for us....thanks.
|
I'm sorry, in THIS thread, what does Brooks sucking have to do with Jake Delhomme? And the Panthers aren't even IN the game if not for Jake, but Brooks helped kick us right out the game. But let's focus on Brooks here, explain to me how he had no fault for THIS loss, since his three turnovers(really 4 but with Brooks you get to pick and choose which TOs count) had nothing to do with our losing. LMAO!!
|
i think it was because we stink and need a new coach and to clean house
|
Actually it was more of Steve Smith that kept the Panthers in the game!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Saints fans better enjoy the Week 1 miracle because Brooks will continue to get in the way of the Saints' enjoying consistent success. The Saints have the necessary personnel to field a potent offense -- a decent line, top-flight receivers and a big-play running back. However, Brooks is the anti-Tom Brady. Brooks makes stupid decisions, has zero leadership ability and isn't particularly tough or poised in the pocket. |
Delhomme threw the pass but it was the YAC that made the difference on that 53 yard TD that put them back in the game.
|
Quote:
|
From the looks of the first three games the Saints will get in the way of their ability to enjoy sucess. The last two weeks we started down 7-0 the the first minute of the game. If I was a head coach I would kick the ball off even if I won the toss at these odds. And I don't know what's wrong with #26 but he better get it going! It looks like he lost all of his moves!
|
Quote:
It's an inexcusable problem. It extends back for years, not just this year. We simply - must - suck the opening quarter of most games. One play into the game, down 7. Three minutes into the game, down 10 or 14. I was saying the same thing to my girlfriend during the game this week.. Why don't we kick at the opening, or just let the ball bounce? It'd be better than recent history. The consistency of it is the killer. That's a coaching problem. |
THe point is still that HE didn't lead HIS team to a victory either!
|
its the O-line they suck
|
I kind of see the loss as the whole team isn't very good.
Aaron Brooks, Aaron Stecker Fred McAfee EVERYONE |
This team will not get to the Superbowl with AB at the quaterback period. We won't get back to the playoffs with him unless it's by default having an 8-8 season. His passes are too hard, too low, not hitting the receivers in stride. Having catch up stats didn't impress me last year and so far it doesn't this year. AB had one of his fluke games already against Carolina. He's due one more.
|
It's no wonder...the coaching sucks. Why is this such a surprise all of a sudden. Thats why you blow it up and just start over. Offense, defense the whole shabang.
And yes that includes dumping Brooks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well the fact of the matter is this....we need to get rid of the coach because that is the only way that we will draft a LB in the first round, get an impact CB and DT in free agency, teach our o line to block and get rid of AB. However getting rid of Has would mean that we would be rebuilding. Gotta start it sometime. We gave him 5 years and he's yielded no results. You have to cut your losses somewhere. This problem is much bigger than a few players.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Uhhh I think he's makes sense. Who in the world plans on defensive scoring to win a game. When it happens it's good but no coach plans on it. It's one thing to say that the defense sucks we all know that. It's quite another to say that they should be scoring points for us. I saw you wrote in another post that the offense can struggle but the D is not supposed to. That's ridiculous.
If our D had stopped them on that first possesion, what makes you think we would've been able to score anyway. Didn't you see that we were like 2 for 11 on third down....AB had a QB rating of 1.9 at one point??? I guess thats the D's fault too though. |
So build a defense, depend on them to score, and just have offense on the field to meet the rules? Did you just start watching football? are you from another country? Last year our offense couldn't convert on takeaways. And just by your argument that the defense needs to score for us to win you pretty much by default admit that our offense is an overpaid practice squad. How many superbowls did that Mora defense win us or playoff games for that matter? If you can't have an offense to control the clock or score if the defense can't score for them then why have an offense? And yes I just finished potty training and i still understand more about the game than you do.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dude just drop the defensive scoring theory. The D's job is to DEFEND not score. How many defensive scores did the Colts have last year??? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What does the Defense have to do with 2 for 11 on third down??? Or 2 fumbles?? Or 2 interceptions??? Stop living in the past...it's 2005 now. The Dome Patrol and the 3-4 is gone. Today our D sucks, our O sucks and Aaron Brooks STILL needs to go, sorry. I'm so sure that John Fox is saying....we would've won if our cornerbacks had run back a couple of INTs back for touchdowns....lo So tell me...how many defensive touchdowns a game is adequate for you?? If we had one for each of the past 2 games we would have still lost, right???? |
Quote:
|
you don't have a point. you asked a question I answerd it. What you think is your point is a delusion. You are the only one on this board saying the defense should be responsible for scoring points. How did San Francisco win all those games or St. Louis win? Are they wrong? I'll answer that one for you, yes. On a team you want Balance. A ball contrlling offense that can score and a defense that doesn't let the game get away.
|
Quote:
|
I don't understand either the offense was made easier for him and he is worse than year than ever. Does anyone want to attempt to explain that. Turnovers and the coach are the other problems that we need to address immediately or its over fellas.
|
I will explain AB's playbook (the revised edition)
1. Get behind the center. He has a hand towel hanging off his ass. 2. Say the words.. HIKE. 3. When the center hands you the ball try your best to hold on to it. 4. Try and look for someone to throw the ball to. 4a. Try to make sure they have the same color uniform as you have on. 5. If all of this fails, go to the side lines and laugh about it with the coach. Any questions? Good, class dismissed! |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com