Charles Grant Trade

saintswhodi · 04-11-2006, 08:30 PM

Originally Posted by Boogro

Is that what you watch the games for? To see who gets double the most? Do you really believe Grant is that good? Are you willing to pay him that money? So, basically you are saying 2.5 sacks is acceptable and you are willing to be ok with this as long as it is Grant who gets double teamed. Also, it was Howard who played the majority at DT on passing situations.

A) At what point did I say Grant played the majority of the time at DT in passing situations. I just said he played there and wasn't suited for it. Oops.

B) What money are you talking about for Grant? Has he made a contract demand? Are he and the team in negotiations on a new deal? What? Why is that even a part of your already poor argument?

C) Grant is one of my favorite players, so you are damn right I watch to see what he's doing. I also replay games a second time, and I went to three live last season. You obviously saw zero games. Kudos to you.

D) I do believe Grant is very good. If a player can't have a down year, on a 3-13 team, where he was the only defender teams were worried about until LATE in the season when they started waking up to Will, after a hurricane that destroyed the city and forced the entire team to endure things no other NFL franchise in history had to, then we should just cut everybody and build a roster from 0 to 53 with none of the current players right? Good call.

04-11-2006, 08:30 PM	#15
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by Boogro Is that what you watch the games for? To see who gets double the most? Do you really believe Grant is that good? Are you willing to pay him that money? So, basically you are saying 2.5 sacks is acceptable and you are willing to be ok with this as long as it is Grant who gets double teamed. Also, it was Howard who played the majority at DT on passing situations. A) At what point did I say Grant played the majority of the time at DT in passing situations. I just said he played there and wasn't suited for it. Oops. B) What money are you talking about for Grant? Has he made a contract demand? Are he and the team in negotiations on a new deal? What? Why is that even a part of your already poor argument? C) Grant is one of my favorite players, so you are damn right I watch to see what he's doing. I also replay games a second time, and I went to three live last season. You obviously saw zero games. Kudos to you. D) I do believe Grant is very good. If a player can't have a down year, on a 3-13 team, where he was the only defender teams were worried about until LATE in the season when they started waking up to Will, after a hurricane that destroyed the city and forced the entire team to endure things no other NFL franchise in history had to, then we should just cut everybody and build a roster from 0 to 53 with none of the current players right? Good call.