Mangold

saintswhodi · 04-23-2006, 02:54 AM

Then I will continue to strongly disagree, and leave it at that. Nothing in your argument Kool made me feel as if it is a good idea to take linemen with our first two picks. You say since we feel Brees will make our O-line better, won't coaching make our D better? Well one, Brees is actually on the field to make the offense better. If we had these coaches, and Aaron Brooks still at QB, I would still have no faith in Brooks. By the same token, coaching alone won't help our D, we need players as well. At LB and DT mainly. There is no argument you could make that won't have me thinking we are still gonna get gashed by opposing offenses without adding a stud defender from the draft to our D. I just can not see it. There is not an argument out there that will make me think taking two o-linemen with out first two picks is a good idea. Not one. Sorry bro. Just differences of opinion here.

04-23-2006, 02:54 AM	#28
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Then I will continue to strongly disagree, and leave it at that. Nothing in your argument Kool made me feel as if it is a good idea to take linemen with our first two picks. You say since we feel Brees will make our O-line better, won't coaching make our D better? Well one, Brees is actually on the field to make the offense better. If we had these coaches, and Aaron Brooks still at QB, I would still have no faith in Brooks. By the same token, coaching alone won't help our D, we need players as well. At LB and DT mainly. There is no argument you could make that won't have me thinking we are still gonna get gashed by opposing offenses without adding a stud defender from the draft to our D. I just can not see it. There is not an argument out there that will make me think taking two o-linemen with out first two picks is a good idea. Not one. Sorry bro. Just differences of opinion here.