Evaluating Players
 

After a debate on a previous thread, I was just wondering how everyone ranks players(past and present) I know the ultimate goal is to win a superbowl but just because a player has a superbowl ring, does that mean he is automatically better than a player who never got one? Of couse not. Sure, there have been many great players to win superbowls but the opposite is also true. If you were putting a fantasy team together, would all of your players have superbowl rings. If your anwser is no, then that proves my point. If your anwser is yes, please ship me a bottle of whatever that is that your drinking.

Evaluating Players
 

B&B,

Please forgive that last (your) and insert you\'re.

I know how this bothers you........MY BAD.........

Evaluating Players
 

Mock me now, but one day you will answer to the grammar gods, and I won\'t be around to help you.
And if I had to pick a team out of all the players of all the teams in the past up until now, every stinking one of them would have a super bowl ring- it would be a prereq to being on my team. The reason? There has been so much talent spread out over league\'s history, that I can find a great player at every position that has won a super bowl. And by great player, I mean hall of fame great.

Evaluating Players
 

B&B...you should have your on column somewhere. Your a funny dude. BUT if you stick with all superbowl players, my team would be favored by (2) touchdowns.

Gatorman,

I like to tee and high and let it fly. I get much better responses when I try to cram my opinion down someones throat.

Evaluating Players
 

...and you know this how?

Evaluating Players
 

Jimmy the Greek told me.

Evaluating Players
 

Was that before or after his KKK rally?

Evaluating Players
 

Peraonally I like Jimmy the Greek and white brings out his eyes.

Evaluating Players
 

Hey now. that\'s below the belt.

Evaluating Players
 

Ok. gator, I\'ve now filed my \"gatorman fan club\" button in the drawer right next to the \"LSU owns your gator ass\" button :P