New Orleans 41, Jacksonville 24

ScottyRo · 11-05-2007, 11:26 AM

Originally Posted by mikesaintfan

good to see everyone in good spirits today
Is there anyone who is gonna try and say "the o-line sucked" or "bush can't do it" or anything else... where are all the ney-sayers today?

Was there anything about this game or the other 3 wins that suggest that the O-Line DID NOT suck the first 3 or 4 games? I said a couple weeks ago that when they play well I will say that they did. Again, they played well. Perhaps, even great. However, I still say the O-line was the sole cause for the first 2 losses and contributed heavily to the next 2. No one is happier than I that they have turned it around.

I guess what I'm trying to get at is the need for some people to call out others for pointing out was should have been obvious to everyone. Am I now a nay-sayer because the O-line played poorly early on and I said so?

This was probably not directed at me, but I've seen this 3 or 4 times in different threads since yesterday, but I don't get the logic.

11-05-2007, 11:26 AM	#8
ScottyRo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Williamsburg, VA (ugh, the food here) Posts: 1,704	Re: New Orleans 41, Jacksonville 24 Originally Posted by mikesaintfan good to see everyone in good spirits today Is there anyone who is gonna try and say "the o-line sucked" or "bush can't do it" or anything else... where are all the ney-sayers today? Was there anything about this game or the other 3 wins that suggest that the O-Line DID NOT suck the first 3 or 4 games? I said a couple weeks ago that when they play well I will say that they did. Again, they played well. Perhaps, even great. However, I still say the O-line was the sole cause for the first 2 losses and contributed heavily to the next 2. No one is happier than I that they have turned it around. I guess what I'm trying to get at is the need for some people to call out others for pointing out was should have been obvious to everyone. Am I now a nay-sayer because the O-line played poorly early on and I said so? This was probably not directed at me, but I've seen this 3 or 4 times in different threads since yesterday, but I don't get the logic.