Kaesviharn should stay starting safety

QBREES9 · 12-16-2007, 04:06 PM

Who agrees kaesviharn should stay starting safety over Bullocks
from what I've seen today kk has done a hell'va lot better than bullocks who in my opinion is horrible.
I believe Bullocks has run out of time and will never be better than what he is all though kk is not the best but better.

WVSaint · 12-16-2007, 04:53 PM

without question

UK_WhoDat · 12-16-2007, 04:55 PM

Good call.

KK is a bit of a ball hawk, and he stings on arrival. Reminds WR/TE not to bother coming back

hagan714 · 12-16-2007, 04:57 PM

Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet.

UK_WhoDat · 12-16-2007, 05:10 PM

Originally Posted by hagan714

Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet.

Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED

TheDeuce · 12-16-2007, 05:27 PM

Originally Posted by UK_WhoDat

Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED

I don't know what games you were watching a few weeks ago, but in the games I saw, Bullocks was getting embarrased out there. The guy has clearly regressed since his first season, a season when I thought he was going to be a really good player. He's a liability in coverage, and he's not a sure tackler. That's not a good combo in my book.

But I completely agree about KK, that guy is awesome. He's a ballhawk and things just happen when he gets around the ball. He's also a very good tackler, something that this team needs.

UK_WhoDat · 12-16-2007, 06:41 PM

Bullocks: Yes. Over the whole season I would rate him D. But he performed v Tampa Bay (a day when most of the Saints organisation did not)

FireVenturi · 12-16-2007, 07:25 PM

KK hands down, no brainer!

geauxldenhustle25 · 12-16-2007, 07:30 PM

bullocks is afraid of the ball, KK is hungry for the ball... I'll take hunger over fear.

LordOfEntropy · 12-16-2007, 10:54 PM

No argument. KK is 1st string. He's proved himself in my book, consistently.

12-16-2007, 04:06 PM	#1
QBREES9 Moderator Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Haven Ct Posts: 23,989	Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Who agrees kaesviharn should stay starting safety over Bullocks from what I've seen today kk has done a hell'va lot better than bullocks who in my opinion is horrible. I believe Bullocks has run out of time and will never be better than what he is all though kk is not the best but better.

12-16-2007, 04:53 PM	#2
WVSaint 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: West Virginia Posts: 807	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety without question

12-16-2007, 04:55 PM	#3
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 4,000	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Good call. KK is a bit of a ball hawk, and he stings on arrival. Reminds WR/TE not to bother coming back

12-16-2007, 04:57 PM	#4
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet.

12-16-2007, 05:10 PM	#5
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 4,000	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Originally Posted by hagan714 Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet. Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED
	Last edited by UK_WhoDat; 12-16-2007 at 05:14 PM..

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

12-16-2007, 05:27 PM	#6
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Originally Posted by UK_WhoDat Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED I don't know what games you were watching a few weeks ago, but in the games I saw, Bullocks was getting embarrased out there. The guy has clearly regressed since his first season, a season when I thought he was going to be a really good player. He's a liability in coverage, and he's not a sure tackler. That's not a good combo in my book. But I completely agree about KK, that guy is awesome. He's a ballhawk and things just happen when he gets around the ball. He's also a very good tackler, something that this team needs.
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928

12-16-2007, 06:41 PM	#7
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 4,000	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Bullocks: Yes. Over the whole season I would rate him D. But he performed v Tampa Bay (a day when most of the Saints organisation did not)

12-16-2007, 07:25 PM	#8
FireVenturi Cold as Ice! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Da Big Easy Posts: 2,978	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety KK hands down, no brainer!

12-16-2007, 07:30 PM	#9
geauxldenhustle25 THIS IS HOW WE DO IT Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 53	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety bullocks is afraid of the ball, KK is hungry for the ball... I'll take hunger over fear.

12-16-2007, 10:54 PM	#10
LordOfEntropy 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Cary, NC Posts: 1,838	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety No argument. KK is 1st string. He's proved himself in my book, consistently.