New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Kaesviharn should stay starting safety (https://blackandgold.com/saints/19096-kaesviharn-should-stay-starting-safety.html)

QBREES9 12-16-2007 04:06 PM

Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
Who agrees kaesviharn should stay starting safety over Bullocks
from what I've seen today kk has done a hell'va lot better than bullocks who in my opinion is horrible.
I believe Bullocks has run out of time and will never be better than what he is all though kk is not the best but better.

WVSaint 12-16-2007 04:53 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
without question

UK_WhoDat 12-16-2007 04:55 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
Good call.

KK is a bit of a ball hawk, and he stings on arrival. Reminds WR/TE not to bother coming back

hagan714 12-16-2007 04:57 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet.

UK_WhoDat 12-16-2007 05:10 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hagan714 (Post 149235)
Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet.


Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED :cool:

TheDeuce 12-16-2007 05:27 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by UK_WhoDat (Post 149239)
Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED :cool:

I don't know what games you were watching a few weeks ago, but in the games I saw, Bullocks was getting embarrased out there. The guy has clearly regressed since his first season, a season when I thought he was going to be a really good player. He's a liability in coverage, and he's not a sure tackler. That's not a good combo in my book.

But I completely agree about KK, that guy is awesome. He's a ballhawk and things just happen when he gets around the ball. He's also a very good tackler, something that this team needs.

UK_WhoDat 12-16-2007 06:41 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
Bullocks: Yes. Over the whole season I would rate him D. But he performed v Tampa Bay (a day when most of the Saints organisation did not)

FireVenturi 12-16-2007 07:25 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
KK hands down, no brainer!

geauxldenhustle25 12-16-2007 07:30 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
bullocks is afraid of the ball, KK is hungry for the ball... I'll take hunger over fear.

LordOfEntropy 12-16-2007 10:54 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
No argument. KK is 1st string. He's proved himself in my book, consistently.

blacksaint 12-17-2007 12:28 AM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
I agree 100%, K.K. is the starter. With Harper and Kaesviharn as our safeties I feel a lot more comfortable.

hagan714 12-17-2007 06:42 AM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
I do not think I would dump Bullocks over this. He has been in the league 3 years after 2007. He has never had a mentor at his position. KK might be the one to teach him the things he needs to do to make it on the field. Thats all. KK is showing his veteran skills out there.

andersen 12-17-2007 09:10 AM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
Maybe not dump him (back-up), but we need to keep KK on the field. Next step, getting someone to replace Simmoneau.

geauxldenhustle25 12-17-2007 01:59 PM

Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andersen (Post 149364)
Maybe not dump him (back-up), but we need to keep KK on the field. Next step, getting someone to replace Simmoneau.

Brian Simmons? or Marmit (Marvin Mitchell)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com