from detillier, saints go after shockey and move up ?

LordOfEntropy · 04-21-2008, 03:57 PM

Trading away Harper doesn't bother me if we bring in another safety (that is, a starting-caliber safety). If that happens, AND they replace Bullocks, then I'm fine. But I don't see how we'll have enough picks left to make it happen.

And what if we don't?

1) KK and Bullocks as starters??
2) Jay "born before electricity, juked out of his shoes by a QB" Bellamy as a backup??

That can't be the answer. Dude, in that situation, I really don't think the best offense in the world is going to do us any good.

But find a way to replace Harper and Bullocks with quality (how?), and I'm okay with it. Others have suggested moving over a CB. Sure, if that's the plan, and it works, then I have no problem with it.

But the answer CANNOT Bullocks and Bellamy.

04-21-2008, 03:57 PM	#8
LordOfEntropy 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Cary, NC Posts: 1,838	Re: from detillier, saints go after shockey and move up Trading away Harper doesn't bother me if we bring in another safety (that is, a starting-caliber safety). If that happens, AND they replace Bullocks, then I'm fine. But I don't see how we'll have enough picks left to make it happen. And what if we don't? 1) KK and Bullocks as starters?? 2) Jay "born before electricity, juked out of his shoes by a QB" Bellamy as a backup?? That can't be the answer. Dude, in that situation, I really don't think the best offense in the world is going to do us any good. But find a way to replace Harper and Bullocks with quality (how?), and I'm okay with it. Others have suggested moving over a CB. Sure, if that's the plan, and it works, then I have no problem with it. But the answer CANNOT Bullocks and Bellamy.
	can anyone help me id this tune? it goes thwap thwap boom tch boom tch boom tch. Qui a laissez sortir les chiens! Last edited by LordOfEntropy; 04-21-2008 at 03:59 PM..