Originally Posted by indy4192 (Post 201916)

Also the Saints didn't cause the Vikings to have to many guys in the huddle, that was their own stupidity. No penalty at the end of the game, odds are the Vikings don't pass down there but go with another run to set up a field goal attempt.

Originally Posted by Stlrfan (Post 201864)

First off, I'm a Steelers fan if you can't tell by my user name. Secondly why are lucky wins for you different from other teams who are so called "lucky" and not better than their opponents? By YOUR definition, the Saints were not better than the Vikes, they were lucky. Hence, last year, the Colts were not better than the Steelers, they were lucky, fluke bounces, bad calls. Hey, this is all YOUR criteria. By your definition, that means the Colts are not better than the Pats, which I truly do not think they are. The Colts got lucky yet again by a bad decision by BB. The Saints completely owned them. No luck was needed for them to win. The Colts squeaked by. Are you saying the Colts are better than the Pats even though luck played a role? Quit blowing smoke up your behind. The Colts are not a team that is invinsible, walks on water or unbeatable. They aren't the greatest of all time, far from it in fact. Your disrespect to other teams including the Saints is laughable at best. Up until now, the Colts have had nothing to brag about except for countless post season failures. Win something this weekend first before relishing in your own hype.

Originally Posted by indy4192 (Post 201927)

Colts game was AT Phoneix
Saints game was in NO

That makes huge difference, PLUS the Colts were playing the Cards after playing the Dolphins on Monday night and then having to fly to Arizona for a Sunday night game. And we still wooped their butts.

Also remember the Cards destroyed the Vikings for which the Saints struggled to beat in teh NFCCG.

Originally Posted by indy4192 (Post 201911)

How many of the vikings fumbles were caused by hard hits or good tackles and how many were caused by a RB known for fumbling or a bad handoff?

Originally Posted by Stlrfan (Post 201934)

^ Yes, but the Saints destroyed the Pats where the Colts struggled against them to win by 1. Please, we could go on and on and at this point, it sounds to me like you're trying to talk yourself into believing the Colts greatness. Both teams are where they are because they deserve to be there. You will both be playing on neutral ground, so home turf won't mean a thing. They are both very good teams and the best team will end up on top. If it's the Colts, then so be it, they're the better team, but until then both teams have strengths and weaknesses, and yes, the Colts do have weaknesses and one of them will be if they are without Freeney.

Originally Posted by saintpaul25 (Post 201935)

http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l1...4A36ADC1C1.jpg

The only stat that matters. The win.

Originally Posted by boonedocksaint (Post 201938)

hey indy4192....thanks for showing us the truth....

Originally Posted by indy4192 (Post 201955)

For Vegas you are correct, for Joe Football fan you are correct. But for the players playing the game, they know what matters....:cool: