So Sean has to study two quarterbacks

|Mitch| · 01-02-2011, 10:35 PM

Are Hasselbeck and Whitehurst good enough to warrant much studying? We beat them already once this year, nothing much should change...

alleycat_126 · 01-05-2011, 07:41 PM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

Are Hasselbeck and Whitehurst good enough to warrant much studying? We beat them already once this year, nothing much should change...

Sorry, I gotta get you though, everything has changed, no backs except bush, jones and two backups. We were in the comfy confines off the DOME before. Now we go into the elements. We have all the pressure they have very little if any cause they aint even supposed to be playin with that record.

|Mitch| · 01-05-2011, 07:54 PM

At the time of that message, Ivory nor PT were on IR. But just like last time, we should stifle the run and a one dimensional 'hawk team *shouldn't beat us. This is assuming we keep the giveaways to a minimum

01-05-2011, 07:41 PM	#2
alleycat_126 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Katy, Tx a suburb of Houston Posts: 2,089	Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| Are Hasselbeck and Whitehurst good enough to warrant much studying? We beat them already once this year, nothing much should change... Sorry, I gotta get you though, everything has changed, no backs except bush, jones and two backups. We were in the comfy confines off the DOME before. Now we go into the elements. We have all the pressure they have very little if any cause they aint even supposed to be playin with that record.

01-02-2011, 10:35 PM	#1
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Are Hasselbeck and Whitehurst good enough to warrant much studying? We beat them already once this year, nothing much should change...

01-05-2011, 07:54 PM	#3
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	At the time of that message, Ivory nor PT were on IR. But just like last time, we should stifle the run and a one dimensional 'hawk team *shouldn't beat us. This is assuming we keep the giveaways to a minimum