![]() |
Totally sucks ... and the running game
I'm having withdrawal symptoms. I watch last years Super Bowl last night just to try to cure it.
Who else thinks that if we would have had a slightly above average running back this year, LT would have fit nicely, everything would have been better. Brees doesn't throw all those picks (b/c we have a running game) Red Zone % dramtactically better even on defense - we would have scored more so it's way easier when the opponent is in constant "catch-up" mode. Time of possesion would have been way better etc... Just somebody who would have lasted all season (very important) and could have at least been a threat between the tackles, on the screen, and in pass protection. Nothing else needed to have changed. With this, we would have been hosting the NFC Championship game this weekend. |
If our RBs were healthy, it would have been huge, Still need to upgrade the front 7 on defense.
|
we scored 36 and the defense gave up 41, still think its defense we need more adjstments to.
|
Running backs need to stay healthy .... defense has holes all over the front 7
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think with a better running game, we control the ball better, Drew gives up less picks, and the offense scores more points. Still, I agree with you that we need to make more adjustments on defense. |
I won't argue that now that the season is over we can't use upgrades on defense, esp. at the front 7.
BUT '10 would've been a different story IMHO if only for a durable back or even two. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com