Is this logical???
 

Nice try, but that quote does not in any way indicate that I thought that Jake was only responsible for ONE of Carolina\'s wins.

You said
Now if you can find that quote then post it. If you can\'t be a man and just say you were mistaken. I won\'t hold it against you! ;)

Is this logical???
 

Interesting, so how many wins do you feel Delhomme was responsible for then?

Is this logical???
 

I haven\'t thought about it really. I\'d say more than one without blinking tho, which is why I\'ve asked you to locate that quote! ;)

Is this logical???
 

Hhhmm. How many games was AB responsible for winning this year?

Is this logical???
 

Are you trying to deflect from your inability to locate that quote?

:P

Is this logical???
 

Are you avoiding the question? ;)

How come it\'s always you asking the questions and me answering. C\'mon Saintfan, make a statement for once. ;)

Is this logical???
 

Hard stat to figure Whodat, but I\'ll try, just as soon as you deal with the issue on the table...something to do with a quote you\'re supposed to be looking for as I recall.

Let me save you some time and suggest you be a man and admit you made it up. The quote doesn\'t exist. Careful what you type Whodat...cause it might come back and reflect accurately on ya. ;)

LMAO

Is this logical???
 

It simply means that Delhomme had comparable stats his first year starting as McNair had his first year starting. That\'s all it means.
By the same token, bringing Brooks stats to prove he\'s better than someone else doesn\'t hold water either.

I have seen dozens of comparisons made between Brooks\' stats his first seasons with those of Elway, Marino, Montana, to try proving he\'s a s good as they were.
Up until this year, I saw many a post in other boards on how Brooks was better than Peyton because Brooks won a playoff game, and it is all about the wins...

The thing is, don\'t be upset when someone uses the same argument as you, to prove his point.
Don\'t try proving Brooks is the next Elway by comparing their stats their first years, but then dismiss a post that compares Brooks\'s and Delhomme\'s stats their first year.
Don\'t say \"it\'s all about the wins, he won a playoff game\", and then turn around and say \"but he\'s got defense\"..

Is this logical???
 

Fantastic post 47. I like you already.

OK Saintfan, I will be happy to admit that I misconstrued one of your posts. That has happened to all of us at one point. If that\'s not what you meant, I\'ll be happy to say that I was mistaken.

Now, on to the more important issue. That being why you cannot answer a simple question simply put without deflecting attention to another topic. I think you know that you just painted yourself into a corner and you don\'t want to admit that you can\'t get out.

You said that you would credit Delhomme with more than one of Carolina\'s victories without blinking. I ask AGAIN, how many Saint wins to you credit to Brooks this season?

Think you can answer the question this time?

Is this logical???
 

Why, thank you!
I aim to please :)