Jeff Duncan couldn't be more wrong if he said 2+2=8

westbankdaze · 01-21-2012, 07:14 AM

Originally Posted by SloMotion

Well, if I may interject ..... and it's just my perspective because I just can't seem to stay out of a good football conversation ..... turnovers are the most important stat in football, and that's not to point fingers at the offense either. SFran scored, what?, 14pts on the turnovers? It made all the difference.

These two quotes stuck out the most in the article to me: "First and foremost, the 49ers simply made more big plays than the Saints." ... "Forget all the talk about the running game and defense winning championships. In today's NFL, games are won and lost by big plays." Both ring true.

Today's game is light years away (and I feel a blog coming on) from what it used to be, and you win by thinking 'outside the box'. Greg Williams was thinking 'outside the box', he had 'em on the ropes and he was gonna' finish 'em. He just blitzed 'em on the previous play and figured no way they would expect it again. It's the killer instinct you want to see in a defensive coordinator. Personally, I think it was a bonehead move in that type situation, but as it has been so eloquently pointed out, "hindsight is 20/20". Who's to say what I woulda' done in that situation, go for the glory or err on the side of caution? Be the hero, be the goat ..... that's what was going through GW's mind. He took a shot. IDK, maybe he knew he was on the way out?

Not sticking up for Williams, I'd rather have Spagnualo anyway, just think the turnovers were more a factor then your defense. I keep going back to the four lead changes in the last four minutes ..... SFran didn't beat you guys, they just outlasted you.

Turnovers were a direct result of San Fran's defense. People keep pointing out that turnovers were something we had control over as if we were somehow able to control when they happened. That's a load of a croc.

San Fran's defense did little in the last 4 minutes as our offense got exponentially better. They didn't really outlast us what happened was that our defense completely fell apart in the end. Don't you think it's strange that we were able to contain the niners all game and then somehow just fold like a wet noodle in the end? GW's blitzing is a double edged sword of which we came out on the wrong side in the last 4 minutes.

Folks rightly blame GW because you have to put this game in context of his three year tenure. Our defense really has struggled to get pressure and turnovers. You can see how much lesser we have performed without Sharper. GW's scheme frankly didn't work for us and it epically failed in probably one of of not the the worst loss we have ever suffered in the playoffs.

That game really did showcase the ineptitude of GW's system.

01-21-2012, 07:14 AM	#20
westbankdaze 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 843	Originally Posted by SloMotion Well, if I may interject ..... and it's just my perspective because I just can't seem to stay out of a good football conversation ..... turnovers are the most important stat in football, and that's not to point fingers at the offense either. SFran scored, what?, 14pts on the turnovers? It made all the difference. These two quotes stuck out the most in the article to me: "First and foremost, the 49ers simply made more big plays than the Saints." ... "Forget all the talk about the running game and defense winning championships. In today's NFL, games are won and lost by big plays." Both ring true. Today's game is light years away (and I feel a blog coming on) from what it used to be, and you win by thinking 'outside the box'. Greg Williams was thinking 'outside the box', he had 'em on the ropes and he was gonna' finish 'em. He just blitzed 'em on the previous play and figured no way they would expect it again. It's the killer instinct you want to see in a defensive coordinator. Personally, I think it was a bonehead move in that type situation, but as it has been so eloquently pointed out, "hindsight is 20/20". Who's to say what I woulda' done in that situation, go for the glory or err on the side of caution? Be the hero, be the goat ..... that's what was going through GW's mind. He took a shot. IDK, maybe he knew he was on the way out? Not sticking up for Williams, I'd rather have Spagnualo anyway, just think the turnovers were more a factor then your defense. I keep going back to the four lead changes in the last four minutes ..... SFran didn't beat you guys, they just outlasted you. Turnovers were a direct result of San Fran's defense. People keep pointing out that turnovers were something we had control over as if we were somehow able to control when they happened. That's a load of a croc. San Fran's defense did little in the last 4 minutes as our offense got exponentially better. They didn't really outlast us what happened was that our defense completely fell apart in the end. Don't you think it's strange that we were able to contain the niners all game and then somehow just fold like a wet noodle in the end? GW's blitzing is a double edged sword of which we came out on the wrong side in the last 4 minutes. Folks rightly blame GW because you have to put this game in context of his three year tenure. Our defense really has struggled to get pressure and turnovers. You can see how much lesser we have performed without Sharper. GW's scheme frankly didn't work for us and it epically failed in probably one of of not the the worst loss we have ever suffered in the playoffs. That game really did showcase the ineptitude of GW's system.
westbankdaze 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 843

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/40583-jeff-duncan-couldnt-more-wrong-if-he-said-2-2-8-a.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Jeff Duncan couldn't be more wrong if he said 2+2=8	This thread	Refback	01-20-2012 09:33 PM	9