![]() |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Optimism:
1-The Saints are a talent laden team with very few glaring holes. 2-We were a few plays away from being 10-6 or 11-5. 3-There won’t be any massive make-overs going into 2004. Continuity certainly couldn’t hurt. 4-We are young at most positions, so team improvement is very likely as experience increases. 5-2004 draft is very promising for addressing the Saints primary needs, CB/LB. 6-Of the consensus needs, all but LB and CB have been addressed. We haven’t downgraded any position. Although T-rex is debatable. 7-The injury bug isn’t likely to devastate this team 2 years in a row, (knock on wood). 8-The signing of a highly respected and sought after D-line coach will most likely improve the unit substantially. 9-Many NFC teams took an offseason hit IMO, (SF, STL, TB, NYG, GB) 9-After 30 plus years of misery, we’re due! Pessimism: 1- A few of our main holes on this team (LB/CB) haven’t been addressed yet. Depending on 2 rookies to fill those holes is risky. 2-The coaching staff has yet to prove they have what it takes for us to take the next step. 3-Our LB crew hasn’t improved in 3 years, and so far it appears not much has been done about it. 4-We are one key injury (you know who he is) from absolute devastation. I refuse to even mention his name and injury in the same sentence. 5-Many of the NFC teams appear to have gotten much better on paper, (Dall, Wash, Minn, Sea, Phl) 6-After 30 plus years of misery, its inevitable that it will continue. [Edited on 13/4/2004 by Danno] |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Good post, Danno.
I agree with quite a bit of your assessments. I\'m surprised you haven\'t gotten more feedback. Maybe it\'s cause most agree with what you\'ve laid out here. First, the positives. 1. Agreed. The problem is that we\'ve had these problems (LB and CB) for at least two years. The very positive side is that we don\'t really have holes on the offensive side. Can any of you that have been Saints fans for years remember the last time this was true? 2. Definitely. I don\'t like whining over bad calls or injuries, but the FO has to consider this in free agency. 3. I am most excited about this point. Constant turnover in any endeavor is never, ever a good thing. Worst case scenario is that consistency provides no excuses for the coaching staff. 4. Ditto 5. Keepin\' my fingers crossed. 6. Still a huge concern at LB and CB although I am glad that we did not overpay for a corner. The market went north way too quickly. I think that the combination of Gash and B. Johnson will make up for the loss of T. Smith. 7. I\'m banging my head against a wood plank as I type. 8. Yippee!! Best of all... San Fran is gonna SUUUUUUCK!! next year!!! (Old hates die hard. 9. A... friggin\'.... men! I\'m too pumped to answer the negative. I\'ve just come home from a kick azzzz fishin\' trip. Too happy to be sad. .02 |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Yea, I put quite a bit of time into this post and was quite disappointed at the lack of feedback. Maybe I didn\'t put enough Eli/Brooks love-hate comments into the post.
Or maybe the two 9\'s under the Optimism confused everyone. Thanks for the feedback though. |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Quote:
|
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
I\'m optimistic about this season for the saints. But, I\'m usually an optimistic person. Now don\'t go holdin\' that against me, now!! The Saints could finish anywhere from 0-16 to 16-0. Of couse -- neither one of those is very likely, so, maybe they\'ll go 8-8, which is where most of the negitive folk tend to place them every year, because they don\'t like going out on a limb and making a REAL prediction. They tend to always play it safe and be well..............NEGITIVE.
I think we\'ll make it to the playoffs, and how much more can you ask than that, before the season ever starts. I wish I knew what teams were going to do what, but I DON\'T!! So, for now, I\'ll let someone else tell me. Hi folks!! -- :D -- ;) -- [Edited on 25/3/2004 by DatWho.] |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
good post D but i don\'t see where you think philly has gotten better on paper
they lost damn near half their defense in the last 2 years and kearse is not gonna help that much from the injury cart TO does not help this team significantly, they\'ve been winning the last 4 years on their defense which is now almost gone and some serious miracles this past year (i can think of almost 4 games off the top of my head that they should have lost) anyway back to the saints, i posted bout a week ago that i feel really good about the saints going into this year, i don\'t know why i just have a feeling that i haven\'t had in about 4 years, i\'m perfectly happy with the way the offseason has gone for us with the exception of letting t-rex go now if we just draft vilma i\'ll be good to go |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Bump...
Which side of the fence do all you new guys fall on regarding the upcoming season? The Sunshine Club or Stormy Weather Moonbeams? |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Well me being a new guy Danno ... I would say Im in between the two. I hope we do awsome and have the expectations but in the back of my mind I have to remain critical.
|
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Quote:
By the way Danno, I LOVE the \"moonbeams\" thing. ...and I needed a good laugh today too! Gatorman and Whodat have ganged up on me again. :mad: :P |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Woe is you Saintfan. Woe is you. ;)
|
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Looks like I\'ve just been Moonbeamed! LOL
|
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Here you go Chuck, would you consider this fair and balanced...REALISM if you must.
|
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
I am only disputing this to show that there is a slant, to some degree. Overall I generally agree with Danno, but...
Quote:
2 - We were also a few plays away from being 6-10 or 7-9. 3 - Continuity could lead to more of the same old. Poor run defense, undisciplined team... there has been a different/new problem every season in the last three. 4 - Or we could continue to make young-player mistakes. Plus, you assume with experience comes improvement. Has that been the case with our LBs, for example? 5 - Craft means we probably won\'t go CB in round one, the LBs in round 1 are considered by some to be a stretch, and now we seem to be interested in WRs. 6 - We have gotten worse at FB, no question. That\'s going to affect Deuce\'s production and as he goes, we go. 7 - Or maybe our players use bad technique or are put in the wrong place by the scheme. Maybe that has to do with why we\'re so injury prone. 8 - or they could get worse as it takes time for the to learn the new system and \'gel\'. 9 - And many bolstered their position. 10 - Or this is just our MO and we\'re forever mired in mediocrity. Now, I simply did that as an example. I DO NOT agree with a lot of that, it is just an exercise. True, a couple of those are reaches, but I just want to show that the other half is not so unbelievable or unrealistic. |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
Most of what you listed I also listed under the fair and balanced Pessimism section also.
WhoDat, I think we agree on whats good about this team and whats bad about this team. Good-Good young core of talented players, very close to being a great team. Bad-Coach and front office have yet to show they know how to ride this horse. I think Haz and company are young and still learning. They may get better or they may not. I think their futures ride on this season, regardless of circumstances beyond their control, like injuries or bad calls. I think they are more likely to improve than they are to get worse or even stand pat. I disagree with your assessment that we were a couple of plays away from 6-10. This team was much closer to 10-6 than it was 6-10. |
2004, Optimism/Pessimism? REVISITED
The whole point of that post was just to point out both the positives and the negatives with this team.
Some people refuse to acknowledge the negatives (the Sunshine Pounders), and some refuse to acknowledge the positives (the Stormy Weather Moonbeams). I lie slightly skewed to the Optimistic side. I\'m a Skeptical Optimist. You are right though. This isn\'t like politics where you have a 2 party system. Its OK to be somewhere in between. I thought it was a balanced evaluation of both sides. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com