|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I am really hoping that we franchise Nicks and sign Colston for another 5 years. The dude is our #1 receiver and is a freakin stud. I know Nicks is just as valuable but I believe Colston over Nicks at ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
1000 Posts +
|
I am really hoping that we franchise Nicks and sign Colston for another 5 years. The dude is our #1 receiver and is a freakin stud. I know Nicks is just as valuable but I believe Colston over Nicks at this point. As we all know, Brees is the first thing that needs to get done and the front office needs to hurry the hell up. I dont know whats taking so long. He needs to feel that we want him to stay around for a long time and I hope that these on going discussions are not pissing off Brees. Just my OP.
|
SUPER BOWL CHAMPS 2009 :)
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Originally Posted by B_Dub_Saint
I agree, but tagging Nicks will cost us 10 mill this year, so still no bargain. At least if JJ or some other free spending owner goes after him, we get 2 number 1's. I can see Snyder doing that, but very few others.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
I had to WIKI it yesterday--
Types of franchise tag There are two types of franchise tag designations: the exclusive rights franchise tag, and non-exclusive rights franchise tag: An "exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position as of a date in April of the current year in which the tag will apply, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. Exclusive franchise players cannot negotiate with other teams. A "non-exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position in the previous year, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. A non-exclusive franchise player may negotiate with other NFL teams, but if he signs an offer sheet from another team, the original team has a right to match the terms of that offer, or if it does not match the offer and thus loses the player, is entitled to receive two first-round draft picks as compensation |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,964
|
Originally Posted by ScottF
![]()
And you honestly think that someone would be willing to give up those two 1st round picks just for the honor of signing Nicks into a very expensive long-term contract? |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Originally Posted by FinSaint
No.![]()
The point of franchising a guy is to buy time in the contract negotiations, or at the very least get another year out of him at a 'lower' rate. Maybe at this point next year Nicks isn't a pro bowler, or maybe we get a deal done before then, who knows. The tag basically keeps him as our property for another year. big 'IF' -- if a team thinks he is worth two number 1's (which he is, btw), then they can sign him to an offer sheet. So, the tag then becomes an insurance policy |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,964
|
Originally Posted by ScottF
![]()
And I for one would be overjoyed if they did that, since those picks would be extremely valuable in the coming seasons, but I just can't see it happening. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
Originally Posted by ScottF
Thanks, I did not know that!! Now from that I have a question: Could the Saints be thinking that we could get 2 #1 for Nicks, it would explain why they are dragging their feet with Brees? Also we would have 3 #1 next year, talk about revamping a team with all of those picks, there are a lot of ways to play those cards. Maybe Jerry Jones or Snider helps us out? I'm game!!
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,964
|
Originally Posted by halloween 65
![]()
![]() Not even Jones or Snider would be that stupid... I mean giving up 2 1st round picks for a guard that they would still have to sign to probably the biggest contract ever given to a guard. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
It still amazes me what Jerry does. He throws money around like beads at Mardi Gras, he might think Nicks is the final piece of his trouble, he thinks that way every year, why not? And he might feel he got one over on Payton for the bottle of wine? I hope the moron takes it hook line and stinker!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/41162-patrick-robinson-heavily-linked-tracy-porters-future-saints.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Patrick Robinson heavily linked to Tracy Porter's future with the Saints | This thread | Refback | 02-11-2012 07:40 PM | 2 |