These guys get paid to debate each others. I don't take them serious.

I don't think they even believe the stuff that comes out of their mouths... just presenting sides to an argument.

Dan Patrick even said one day that in production meetings the producers feed these clowns what side of the debate to take (true or not, who knows) but I don't believe a word that piece of garbage has to say about the Saints. The media is still jealous that the Saints ruined their happy ever after ending of Farve riding off into the sunset a SB champ so when ever they have a chance to jump all over the team, they take the team and organization to the wood shed

So true, and Skip always takes the unpopular stance that gets the biggest reaction. Whatever.

They can say what they want about a bounty we didn't hurt anyone that season but Kurt Warner and game was already over and you still have to go out make plays. So I say F*%k all media who want to say our Super Bowl was tainted. Those guys played there A$$ off every week and made plays.

The sports media LOVES to make it sound like championships are tainted or that records need to have an asterisk by them.

Just how do you figure it taints our Superbowl? All we did is put extra money in a kitty as rewards for good play. I have not seen any documented or video proof of anything else. Did we hit certain players hard? Yes we did but so does every other team. Should the Steelers have tainted Superbowls because James Harrison hits people hard and illegal? This is all media BS still being supported by the viqueen fans and that Farve should have been in the superbowl vs Manning.