Tweet by Sean Pamphilon..
 

He was talking at Albert Breer and this was said. I found it intriguing a bit..

https://twitter.com/#!/seanpamphilon...29391546462208

Is this interesting to anyone else?

Then why did the ass release it to the public? :rolleyes:

Bingo. That's what I found intriguing. So the NFL knew, didn't ask for it, but he thought the should release it due to player safety?

Hmmmmm....

I smell something....

had to be some money involved somewhere, sucks that he took advantage of Gleason the way he did though

It's kinda interesting to ME in that exchange, that @Albert Breer asks Pamphilon "Did Gregg Williams know you were recording the speech?" and Pamphilon responds by flat out EVADING THE QUESTION HE WAS ASKED... he talks about the date the NFL knew he had the tape...not whether or not he had Williams' permission to record it. They were talking about implied consent, can you film or record someone without direct permission.

I agree with Mitch though. I think he released that stuff in order to get ESPN's attention about his documentary, that was stalling out and ESPN was dragging their feet on optioning it. It even said so on his own website, ESPN had accepted the concept and had a "first look" option to buy it, but he hadn't heard from ESPN at all in almost a year.

jackass missed the spotlight so had to tweet something

That he did. The whole conversation seemed off to me.

I tried on the "Tin Foil Hat" again last night, and I think there might be some problem with the "evidence" that is making the league be so gunshy about coming out with it and letting people see it. Implied consent, or recording something without permission (ie wiretapping, or secret cameras, secret eavesdropping on conversations, tapes obtained without permission, etc) would theoretically be one BIG reason, for someone to be able to say they have evidence, but not be able to share it with anybody publicly. I mean it might be what's going on, or it might not be, we just don't know and can't know.

Of all the negative stories recently, this one tops my list. Gleason trusted him to tell his story. He used and betrayed the man and failed to get the story told. I now seriously doubt it will ever be told. It's a moving life story that could have inspired and moved a lot of people especially those close to the disease. I hope I'm wrong.

Is there a transcript for those of us who don't use twitter?

What'd he say?!?!?!?!? Twitter doesn't work well on DoD computers!

Can you help me fix my "Tin Foil Hat"? I threw the dang thing at the wall when I found out what God-all was doing!
I knew that I should have gotten the extended warranty!:broccoli:

Ok. I feel farily stupid this morning. What does that mean??? The NFL breached the Privacy Act? Were they in violation of Executive Order 12323?
Did they read our Facebook messages and find out we were sleeping with their best friend? And now they want to break up but can't tell us how or why they know something is up?

12333* Oops.

How about this:

The NFL knew.... Actually they planted Sean in the locker room to get the evidence. They had reason to believe that GW would be bold enough to make those statements with the tape rolling.

Once the audio was caught, Goodell told Sean to sit on it, until after the NFL had a good climate survey to see how the fans would react. Once he saw he had two options to keep the fans subdued he chose the one that kept any of his evidence out of the public light and kept his informants anonymous.

I wonder if Sean made a nice sizable deposit in the last months?

Set up!

At the expense of Gleason and what he's has had/have to deal with it may not never-ever get told; and isn't it some sort of law for his eavesdropping or tape conversation without said party knowledge? It's people like him - yeah he got paid!!! Hell Gleason should sue him

What was the freaking tweet!!!

To which Breer responded:

I don't "get" twitter.

"The NFL knew I had that audio from the moment Greg Aiello accepted my Facebook March 19th and never asked for it. Read up!"


So then his releasing it the day before the hearing sure seems to me to be a nice way to grab some free publicity. Unless, he was encouraged to wait by some party unnamed by his lawyer......

Then that would mean.....

This **** is starting to make my head hurt,

How does Pamphilon get some kind of positive spin from this? Maybe some season tickets right beside Tim Landry's or something?