|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by x626xBlack I actually have zero knowledge of unions other than what I have seen or read.... I do have a fair bit of experience with "risk management" however. B. Personal Conduct Policy The Policy received a wholesale ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Donated Plasma
|
Originally Posted by x626xBlack
Well then if this unilateral control is new then I agree 100% that Smith has failed 100% and the NFLPA should replace him immediately. AND they should strike...just sayin... ![]()
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,047
|
Originally Posted by saintfan
They can't strike with out being decertified as a union at this point, they can replace him though... ![]()
Once you have the opinion that the CBA is the reason Goodell has all of this power, then in essence you agree that it is the NFLPA that caused this and the players can not take it out on the NFL, they have to take it out on their illustrious leader. A strike is only justified if the terms of the CBA are not met. A point to ponder is that ex-players are not getting what they need from the NFLPA but Smith received a $1m bonus... |
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/44689-whos-side-demaurice-smith-really.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Who's side is DeMaurice Smith really on? | This thread | Refback | 06-18-2012 04:04 PM | 3 |