NFLPA outside counsel hints at exculpatory evidence disclosed by league on Monday

TheOak · 06-20-2012, 06:53 AM

Let me state this for the record:

I HOPE I am dead wrong. If I am dead wrong I will make a Roast Black thread and everyone can come in and verbally slay me... I will gladly enjoy it.

History however dictates that I am not wrong though... No matter how much grand standing there is from player council.

Just because you mix a Legal court with Goodells kangaroo court does not mean it will change anything.

1. Ben Roethlisburger - No Charges ever formerly filed, never arrested.. Only accusations, served a 4 game suspension.

2. Packman Jones: Charges dropped. One Year suspension.

3. Way too many players to list found guilty of DWI... No suspensions.

"Conduct" violations are easy to suspend players for... You do not need a conviction or an arrest. What goes on in Goodells courtroom has absolutely nothing to do with what would go on in a legal court of law.

Once again: When the NFLPA gave Goodell soul godlike powers with no check in place, they game him the legal right to do WTF he wants.

The ONLY entity that has the power to sway or remove Goodell is the collective 32 owners.

Even a "pay for performance" is a conduct violation.

SmashMouth · 06-21-2012, 12:41 PM

Originally Posted by x626xBlack

Let me state this for the record:

I HOPE I am dead wrong. If I am dead wrong I will make a Roast Black thread and everyone can come in and verbally slay me... I will gladly enjoy it.

History however dictates that I am not wrong though... No matter how much grand standing there is from player council.

Just because you mix a Legal court with Goodells kangaroo court does not mean it will change anything.

1. Ben Roethlisburger - No Charges ever formerly filed, never arrested.. Only accusations, served a 4 game suspension.

2. Packman Jones: Charges dropped. One Year suspension.

3. Way too many players to list found guilty of DWI... No suspensions.

"Conduct" violations are easy to suspend players for... You do not need a conviction or an arrest. What goes on in Goodells courtroom has absolutely nothing to do with what would go on in a legal court of law.

Once again: When the NFLPA gave Goodell soul godlike powers with no check in place, they game him the legal right to do WTF he wants.

The ONLY entity that has the power to sway or remove Goodell is the collective 32 owners.

Even a "pay for performance" is a conduct violation.

All true... but it may be different this time around with Vilma; Thus the remaining players.

06-20-2012, 06:53 AM	#1
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,055	Let me state this for the record: I HOPE I am dead wrong. If I am dead wrong I will make a Roast Black thread and everyone can come in and verbally slay me... I will gladly enjoy it. History however dictates that I am not wrong though... No matter how much grand standing there is from player council. Just because you mix a Legal court with Goodells kangaroo court does not mean it will change anything. 1. Ben Roethlisburger - No Charges ever formerly filed, never arrested.. Only accusations, served a 4 game suspension. 2. Packman Jones: Charges dropped. One Year suspension. 3. Way too many players to list found guilty of DWI... No suspensions. "Conduct" violations are easy to suspend players for... You do not need a conviction or an arrest. What goes on in Goodells courtroom has absolutely nothing to do with what would go on in a legal court of law. Once again: When the NFLPA gave Goodell soul godlike powers with no check in place, they game him the legal right to do WTF he wants. The ONLY entity that has the power to sway or remove Goodell is the collective 32 owners. Even a "pay for performance" is a conduct violation.
	It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau Last edited by TheOak; 06-20-2012 at 06:55 AM..

06-21-2012, 12:41 PM	#2
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 39,019 Blog Entries: 29	Originally Posted by x626xBlack Let me state this for the record: I HOPE I am dead wrong. If I am dead wrong I will make a Roast Black thread and everyone can come in and verbally slay me... I will gladly enjoy it. History however dictates that I am not wrong though... No matter how much grand standing there is from player council. Just because you mix a Legal court with Goodells kangaroo court does not mean it will change anything. 1. Ben Roethlisburger - No Charges ever formerly filed, never arrested.. Only accusations, served a 4 game suspension. 2. Packman Jones: Charges dropped. One Year suspension. 3. Way too many players to list found guilty of DWI... No suspensions. "Conduct" violations are easy to suspend players for... You do not need a conviction or an arrest. What goes on in Goodells courtroom has absolutely nothing to do with what would go on in a legal court of law. Once again: When the NFLPA gave Goodell soul godlike powers with no check in place, they game him the legal right to do WTF he wants. The ONLY entity that has the power to sway or remove Goodell is the collective 32 owners. Even a "pay for performance" is a conduct violation. All true... but it may be different this time around with Vilma; Thus the remaining players.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/44712-nflpa-outside-counsel-hints-exculpatory-evidence-disclosed-league-monday.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
NFLPA outside counsel hints at exculpatory evidence disclosed by league on Monday	This thread	Refback	06-19-2012 06:18 AM	3