|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Link below... hear me out... Evidence not presented 3 calendar..... shall preclude the introduction... Shall meaning that a court COULD decide to throw out the suspensions based on evidence not being presented according to the agreement in the CBA. They ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
100th Post
|
Old article on "shall"
Link below... hear me out...
Evidence not presented 3 calendar..... shall preclude the introduction... Shall meaning that a court COULD decide to throw out the suspensions based on evidence not being presented according to the agreement in the CBA. They relied on the evidence and other words and opinions not even formed through the research and collecting of the evidence. I don't want them to throw out the suspensions. IS IT JUST ME, or would you like to see them actually play the tape out? I want them to have to show evidence. Call witnesses. Prove that Goodell was out to harm, rather than get our players back (two of which aren't even ours) and we'd still be without Payton. I want Payton back. The only way to get Payton back is to prove the allegations are garbage. Throwing out suspensions wouldn't do a damn thing. Goodell will still win and i hate to say it, but they Saints might even feel like they won too. But maybe, the coaches will finally have to speak out because the players appeals didn't turn out the way they wanted. If I got screwed like this, I'd seriously consider coaching in college. They make $5m a year and they are treated like gods. Not indentured servants. Rant over. So in this article, the following is included: "As Article 46 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement goes, there aren’t many technicalities in the appeal process. Here’s one of them, from Article 46, Section (f)(ii): “In appeals under Section 1(a), the parties shall exchange copies of any exhibits upon which they intend to rely no later than three (3) calendar days prior to the hearing. Failure to timely provide any intended exhibit shall preclude its introduction at the hearing.” Key language: Failure to timely provide any intended exhibit shall preclude its introduction at the hearing. Key word: Shall. As every law student learns when studying “civil procedure” (i.e., the rules for litigating cases), the word “shall” always should (or, I suppose, “shall”) be regarded as a red flag. It conveys a mandatory requirement. No discretion. No exceptions. No wiggle room." Timing of exhibit disclosure could scuttle bounty suspensions | ProFootballTalk |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/45505-old-article-shall.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Old article on "shall" | This thread | Refback | 07-09-2012 12:04 PM | 2 |