New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Article: The Saints ain't sinners (https://blackandgold.com/saints/45970-saints-aint-sinners.html)

QBREES9 07-14-2012 11:12 PM

The Saints ain't sinners
 
1 Attachment(s)
This spring, the football world was rocked by news of the organized bounty system operated by the New Orleans Saints over the last three seasons. The program allegedly involved cash payments for hits against targeted players on the opposing team.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has been aggressive with his punishments. Coaches and management were suspended — head coach Sean Payton for the entire 2012 season; former defensive coordinator Gregg Williams indefinitely; linebacker coach Joe Vitt for six games; and General Manager Mickey Loomis for half the season. The NFL also handed out punishments to four current or former Saints: Jonathan Vilma, Anthony Hargrove, Will Smith and Scott Fujita, with linebacker Vilma receiving the harshest verdict — suspension for the entire 2012 season.



Numbers don't support NFL's punishment for Saints players - latimes.com

foreverfan 07-14-2012 11:22 PM

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5115/5...3a3446ea23.jpg

QBREES9 07-14-2012 11:24 PM

Awesome !

Halo 07-15-2012 01:33 AM

I think the truth is starting to sink in.....

Quote:

We collected data on player injuries for the 2009, 2010 and 2011 football seasons, those in question for the bounty scandal. Each week, teams publicly list a pregame injury report that catalogs every player who might have his performance affected by injury in that weekend's game. Collecting all of those reports provides fairly complete information regarding the timing and severity of player injuries.

With these lists, one can roughly pinpoint when a player was injured by identifying when he is added to an injury report. Though injuries might occur innocently and not technically be "caused" by one's opposition, a team that tends to injure more opponents should stick out in injury reports.

If the Saints tended to injure more players, then teams that played them would tend to list more injuries the following week. To test whether the Saints injured more players than a typical team, one need only compare the number of players added to injury reports after a Saints game to the league-wide average.

Did the New Orleans Saints injure more players?

The data-driven answer is a resounding "no." The Saints appear to have injured far fewer players over the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons.

jlouhill 07-15-2012 09:05 AM

It's about time someone in the media brings up this point. Where's the list of players sent to the hospital after playing us the past three seasons. Hmmmmmm?????

Halo 07-15-2012 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlouhill (Post 418813)
It's about time someone in the media brings up this point. Where's the list of players sent to the hospital after playing us the past three seasons. Hmmmmmm?????

Beyond that, where's the proof any money ever exchanged hands?

Rugby Saint II 07-15-2012 01:30 PM

We are sucky bounty hunters. Thank God these guys make a salary and don't have to rely on the bounty money.:smile:

jlouhill 07-15-2012 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halo (Post 418823)
Beyond that, where's the proof any money ever exchanged hands?

Exactly. No one is denying a system was in place and punishments need to be handed down, but by george let's see this so-called "evidence" to justify the excessive penalty's that Goodell is dishing out at will. I feel like a lot of others that the system we had in place was much the same that other teams run and it wasn't to the degree that it has been made out to be. That's what pisses me off. If we were doing what they say we were doing then show us the evidence to prove it. :pissed:

AsylumGuido 07-15-2012 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlouhill (Post 418848)
Exactly. No one is denying a system was in place and punishments need to be handed down, but by george let's see this so-called "evidence" to justify the excessive penalty's that Goodell is dishing out at will. I feel like a lot of others that the system we had in place was much the same that other teams run and it wasn't to the degree that it has been made out to be. That's what pisses me off. If we were doing what they say we were doing then show us the evidence to prove it. :pissed:

You are not alone. Everything to this point reflects upon a railroad job being done on the Saints' organization and their players. It may not have been intentional, but it might as well have been.

This is why I am so excited by the Freeh's Agency and their investigation into everything involving the Saints. I have little doubt that they will totally discredit proclamations by Goodell and destroy the bogus claims of wire-tapping opponent's communications.

RailBoss 07-16-2012 08:53 AM

You got it Rugby, not much Bounty execution. Probably goes back to Favre where he was too slow to get out of the way of Betty White. Hope the whiner stays retired, Kurt got it the worse and he didn't cry about it.

QBREES9 07-16-2012 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II (Post 418842)
We are sucky bounty hunters. Thank God these guys make a salary and don't have to rely on the bounty money.:smile:

I wouldn't hire us.

xan 07-16-2012 10:50 AM

This article misses the point entirely. It's not how many were injured in a large data set of random and non-random events, it's were the targeted players injured. Where's the data on that? If the players who were allegedly targeted were injured during the games, AND the plays in which that targeted player was injured occurred in an illegal/questionable fashion (or that player was subject to "hits beyond normal course of play" that did not result in injury), then let's see the data on that.

Everything else is whitewash.

burningmetal 07-16-2012 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xan (Post 418985)
This article misses the point entirely. It's not how many were injured in a large data set of random and non-random events, it's were the targeted players injured. Where's the data on that? If the players who were allegedly targeted were injured during the games, AND the plays in which that targeted player was injured occurred in an illegal/questionable fashion (or that player was subject to "hits beyond normal course of play" that did not result in injury), then let's see the data on that.

Everything else is whitewash.

There's no need to review any data on the alleged targeted players. All one needs to do is look back at the games against those players. Aaron Rodgers didn't get hurt, nor did he ever take a hit that was even questionable. Cam Newton in the second game against us just got his ankle turned a little in a pretty routine play. Brett got his ankle turned, but even though viqueens fans didn't like the so called high-low hit, it wasn't overly malicious looking. And considering he stayed in the game, you have to wonder if there were truly a bounty on him why they didn't go back and finish the job. Warner got hit in a perfectly legal way after an interception, and he even admits it was perfectly legal. I find it hard to believe that play had anything to do with a bounty. Why would they wait for an interception to try to hurt him? and besides, he didn't even get injured, it just rang his bell.

And why just those players? If this is what the Saints were all about, why not a bounty on Manning in the Superbowl? Why not a bounty on Tom Brady earlier that year? Visual evidence speaks very loudly against these ridiculous claims.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com