|
|||||||
Who Dat in Court: The Jonathan Vilma Case Explained
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by x626xBlack This is not over by a looooonnnnggggg shot. We will know 1/2 of it by Sep 1, the other half will not be known until after the apeal to the higher court is heard... In the ...
3Likes
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-14-2012, 04:29 PM
|
#5 |
|
Site Donor 2019
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 3,521
|
Originally Posted by x626xBlack
Or just maybe...
That's part of what Mr. Benson was explaining to Goodell. If Vilma does win in court, but the NFL decides to wait for an appeals process before decreasing the suspensions and Payton sits for a year, and it is then found that the Saints had nothing more than the same type of pay for performance scheme that at least a dozen other teams had going (I know that's a heck of a run-on) Then Goodell would be remembered as the commissioner that screwed a team over and not for anything else he's done. Arrogant men worry a lot about their legacy. |
|
«
The Black and Gold Lining
|
LanceMoore16: @LANIEBOSSIER haha i was kidding. Please tell her that I appreciate her support. And give her a hug for me too
»
Threaded Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/48140-who-dat-court-jonathan-vilma-case-explained.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| Who Dat in Court: The Jonathan Vilma Case Explained | This thread | Refback | 08-14-2012 03:13 PM | 14 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 PM.
