What do you guys think about bringing Parcells in as an advisory/motivational role?

NOLA54 · 09-18-2012, 10:27 PM

If Loomis & the org thought that would have been beneficial they would have made arrangements prior to the coaches suspensions. I believe they thought that everything was under control with Kromer & Vitt. So far, it is apparent that all is not well.

The Dude · 09-18-2012, 10:38 PM

Originally Posted by NOLA54

If Loomis & the org thought that would have been beneficial they would have made arrangements prior to the coaches suspensions. I believe they thought that everything was under control with Kromer & Vitt. So far, it is apparent that all is not well.

Problem is Loomis isn't here to make these decisions. I guarantee you he would have done something by now if only it was personnel changes.

|Mitch| · 09-18-2012, 10:42 PM

Originally Posted by The Dude

Problem is Loomis isn't here to make these decisions. I guarantee you he would have done something by now if only it was personnel changes.

I hate to burst your bubble, but even if Loomis were here we wouldn't bring anyone from outside in.

That would have been in the offseason and I thought the Saints and Parcells made it clear it wasn't happening

The Dude · 09-18-2012, 11:11 PM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

I hate to burst your bubble, but even if Loomis were here we wouldn't bring anyone from outside in.

That would have been in the offseason and I thought the Saints and Parcells made it clear it wasn't happening

I sure as hell wish they would. These guys need a little guidance and someone to help spell them from being spread out so thin. Until Vitt gets back at least. I think when the time comes we will be fine. I also think part of the problem with this interim interim thing is the hierarchy in the ranks. I think its a lot harder for Kromer to try and hold some of these position coaches accountable because in after 4 more games he will be their peer again. Thats gotta be a little tough. Having Vitt back will solve that problem. Maybe I should have refraised my thread title to "Do you guys think bring someone in as motivator/advisor like Parcells for the time being" Thats what I meant. Hell I would be happy if he came in and just talked to the team. It couldn't hurt.

09-18-2012, 10:27 PM	#1
NOLA54 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 1,708 Blog Entries: 1	Re: What do you guys think about bringing Parcells in as an advisory/motivational role? If Loomis & the org thought that would have been beneficial they would have made arrangements prior to the coaches suspensions. I believe they thought that everything was under control with Kromer & Vitt. So far, it is apparent that all is not well.

09-18-2012, 10:38 PM	#2
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,060	Re: What do you guys think about bringing Parcells in as an advisory/motivational role? Originally Posted by NOLA54 If Loomis & the org thought that would have been beneficial they would have made arrangements prior to the coaches suspensions. I believe they thought that everything was under control with Kromer & Vitt. So far, it is apparent that all is not well. Problem is Loomis isn't here to make these decisions. I guarantee you he would have done something by now if only it was personnel changes.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,060

09-18-2012, 10:42 PM	#3
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: What do you guys think about bringing Parcells in as an advisory/motivational role? Originally Posted by The Dude Problem is Loomis isn't here to make these decisions. I guarantee you he would have done something by now if only it was personnel changes. I hate to burst your bubble, but even if Loomis were here we wouldn't bring anyone from outside in. That would have been in the offseason and I thought the Saints and Parcells made it clear it wasn't happening

09-18-2012, 11:11 PM	#4
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,060	Re: What do you guys think about bringing Parcells in as an advisory/motivational role? Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| I hate to burst your bubble, but even if Loomis were here we wouldn't bring anyone from outside in. That would have been in the offseason and I thought the Saints and Parcells made it clear it wasn't happening I sure as hell wish they would. These guys need a little guidance and someone to help spell them from being spread out so thin. Until Vitt gets back at least. I think when the time comes we will be fine. I also think part of the problem with this interim interim thing is the hierarchy in the ranks. I think its a lot harder for Kromer to try and hold some of these position coaches accountable because in after 4 more games he will be their peer again. Thats gotta be a little tough. Having Vitt back will solve that problem. Maybe I should have refraised my thread title to "Do you guys think bring someone in as motivator/advisor like Parcells for the time being" Thats what I meant. Hell I would be happy if he came in and just talked to the team. It couldn't hurt.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,060

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/50409-what-do-you-guys-think-about-bringing-parcells-advisory-motivational-role.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
What do you guys think about bringing Parcells in as an advisory/motivational role?	This thread	Refback	09-18-2012 10:33 PM	6