|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Gabe Feldman tweeting this morning: Gabe Feldman ‏@SportsLawGuy CBA Appeals Panel issued its full opinion in the Bounty case this morning, clarifying & expanding on the reasoning from initial opinion Panel: "Saint’s program encompassed…undisclosed compensation agreements & ... agreements to ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Site Donor 2014
Kansas Who Dat Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 380
|
CBA appeals panel issues opinion on bounty case
Gabe Feldman tweeting this morning:
Gabe Feldman @SportsLawGuy CBA Appeals Panel issued its full opinion in the Bounty case this morning, clarifying & expanding on the reasoning from initial opinion Panel: "Saint’s program encompassed…undisclosed compensation agreements & ... agreements to injure that may be judged conduct detrimental" CBA Bounty Appeals Panel: "Provided commish doesn’t impose discipline for undisclosed compensation aspect of program "Decision whether to issue conduct detrimental discipline &selection of appropriate sanction falls squarely w/in his exclusive jurisdiction" In sum, CBA Appeals Panel clarifies/confirms that Commish has exclusive authority to punish players for "intent to injure" aspect of Bounty Appeals panel: NFLPA's argument that plyers were punished for on-field misconduct (thus not w/in commish authority) is "not well-founded." |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/51551-cba-appeals-panel-issues-opinion-bounty-case.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
CBA appeals panel issues opinion on bounty case | This thread | Refback | 10-05-2012 10:35 AM | 7 |