|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I'll pump my fist, and everybody repeat after me: "Who Dat say they going to hereby grant to the Licensee the non-exclusive, non-transferable, royalty free, worldwide license (“License”) to use, reproduce and display the Trademarks on and within the Domain ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#4 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
Re: 'Who Dat?' trademark lawsuit settled
I'll pump my fist, and everybody repeat after me:
"Who Dat say they going to hereby grant to the Licensee the non-exclusive, non-transferable, royalty free, worldwide license (“License”) to use, reproduce and display the Trademarks on and within the Domain Names(s) and Web Pages solely in connection with the promotion of the product, in conformance with the policies, specifications, regulations and standards authorized or stipulated by the Licensor or are supplied to the Licensee by the Licensor and whose character and quality is not altered by the Licensee without the authorization of the Licensor.. The License is for non-commercial use of the Trademarks only and may not be used in connection with any other goods or services without the written consent of Licensor!" Meh. Just doesn't roll off the tongue, now does it. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/52412-who-dat-trademark-lawsuit-settled.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
'Who Dat?' trademark lawsuit settled | This thread | Refback | 10-30-2012 03:45 PM | 5 |