![]() |
Re: Hmmm...
Hmmmm....................:popcorn:
|
Re: Hmmm...
Quote:
The reason we are calling it ugly is because on defense we have only been able to do this to this crippled team... We have 20 sacks for the season and 7 of them were last night. |
Re: Hmmm...
Quote:
Look the D did what was suppose to do. We took advantage of a crappy O line. Just think how much you would be *****in had we not gotten the sacks or the pressure. Be happy we got what we got. |
Re: Hmmm...
I agree that until now we just weren't blitzing as much. We were trying to get basic front 4 pressures and doing on mixing in man and zone coverages to no effect whatsoever. Granted perhaps Spags chose to change to this because of a crippled o-line opponent, but regardless I would like to see us employ this approach going forward. It's clear we can't get any pressure normally unless it's a coverage sack and we are also getting gashed no matter what defense we run so we may as well run one that has the potential to force a mistake or generate a splash play.
|
Re: Hmmm...
Quote:
Not 8itch1ng.. Just perspective. |
Re: Hmmm...
Quote:
Spaggs blitzed not because he thought we were better, but because he knew Vick was the most hit QB in football. He exploited... Do not expect that against Atlanta. |
Re: Hmmm...
Quote:
So why all the pissin and moaning? Not just from you but many. We did what we were suppose to do but instead of acknowleding it, many are bashing it. Just don't make sense to me. |
Re: Hmmm...
Quote:
If we sack Matty Fleice 7 times on Sunday, BBQ for this ENTIRE board at my house. |
Re: Hmmm...
Its the classic bend but don't break.
|
Re: Hmmm...
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com