![]() |
Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
1 Attachment(s)
Okay so.......tell me where is the illegal hit there?
no helmet to helmet, vick lowered his helmet and martez wrapped him up and smacked him with the shoulder pad |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Yeah, I did not like that call purely from the standpoint that Vick was going into a crouch in anticipation of being sacked and any helmet-to-helmet contact by Martez was incidental.
I thought it was going to be a long night with the officials, but it turned out alright ... didn't like the call on the early completion for Vick either (Vitt challenged it & lost), where the ball clearly hit the turf & even kicked something up before being ruled caught. |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
The catch was a catch... The ball can touch the turk.. However he had clear control of it the entire time.
The penalty was BS. |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Im all for the safety factor when it comes to the head. But these helmet to helmet calls are getting ridiculous. And I agree, rules or not, that was NOT a catch.
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
I'm just glad the calls didn't turn the game the other way...
Otherwise, we'd have to go and get all Braveheart and placed effigy heads of the refs along with certain NFL officials on pikes outside the Dome... |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
I knew it was bull**** in fast motion.
what do they want him to do? pull his panties? |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Quote:
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Quote:
I also hope that helmet to helmet hits become something that can be challenged in the future. That is a severe penalty that does not take into account the dynamics of hitting, only the sound. The defender could make a clean hit only to get a flag thrown by a QB slightly moving their head, much like the NBA flop. |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
If the ball had MOVED while the receiver had his hands on it, it would have been ruled incomplete, but since it never moved, even though it was kicking up the Field Turf pellets, is why it was ruled correctly a catch.
The penalty on Wilson's sack of Vick is 100% Bovine Scatology! |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Quote:
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
who cares...we won
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Thats the spirit
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Martez is going to be looked at closely... He was also the one that Denver was crying about.
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Martez should be coaching the rest of the defense on tackling...
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Quote:
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Quote:
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Quote:
http://cdn0.sbnation.com/uploads/cho...dard_730.0.jpg |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
It was a bad call, but at least it didn't hurt us in the end and as far as that picture above goes, that was also a blown call. Ball hit the ground, should have been ruled incomplete.
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Quote:
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
We beat the Eagles and the Refs... so... are we back?
http://www.mj-upbeat.com/images/happy_cat_png.jpg |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
BS call and again we WON !
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
What quarter was the catch?
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
|
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Quote:
It was a catch. |
Re: Refs call Martez for illegal hit on sack - PICTURE EVIDENCE
Yeah, I guess when you see it in motion like that it does look more like he had control and just brushed the turf with the ball rather than he used the ground to gain control ... thanks for doing the legwork guys, :mrgreen:.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com