WhoDat

A certain someone on this board who will remain nameless has been trying to show that negative comments about Brooks in the past were unwarranted by knocking Deuce now. (At least, that what I presume this person's intent is - he cannot actually think this team would be better off without Deuce).

In knocking Deuce he most often points to FUMBLES as the source of the problem. OK - let's take a look at that, shall we.

Fumbles through 2 games: Deuce - 2, Brooks - 4. Uhhh...???

Further, this is the same guy who talked about how Brooks' LEAGUE LEADING lost fumble total last year was so easily correctible and how the fumbling didn't make AB a bad QB. Now he's knocking Deuce. Agenda much?

Finally, and here's the best part, keep in mind that the most fierce of the "Brooks Bashing" happened in the 2002 season and earlier. Does this person believe that Brooks' play has NOT improved since 2001 or 2002 when he was being highly criticized? Sometimes the arguments are just simply transparent. ;)

Here comes the fun! LOL