Raiders Claim Martez Wilson

Tobias-Reiper · 10-23-2013, 05:35 PM

Originally Posted by Halo

Glad he's out of our division....

Why would you be glad a liability in the run game is out of the division?

|Mitch| · 10-23-2013, 05:38 PM

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper

Why would you be glad a liability in the run game is out of the division?

maybe because it would be hell to have to play a player twice a year who thoroughly knows our defensive playbook...

TheOak · 10-23-2013, 05:54 PM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

maybe because it would be hell to have to play a player twice a year who thoroughly knows our defensive playbook...

How is that hell? He wouldn't face our defense.

|Mitch| · 10-23-2013, 06:08 PM

Originally Posted by TheOak

How is that hell? He wouldn't face our defense.

Seriously; it's not that hard to figure out?!

He can spill all his knowledge to the offense/coordinator and they can game-plan against our defense. Not to mention any knowledge about the offense(audible calls, etc...) he may have could give the defense a slight edge.

Just like Fujita did with the Browns a couple of years ago...

Danno · 10-23-2013, 05:55 PM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

maybe because it would be hell to have to play a player twice a year who thoroughly knows our defensive playbook...

True, a positively mediocre Scott Fujita gave us fits once. Never did much else though.

Halo · 10-24-2013, 11:28 AM

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper

Why would you be glad a liability in the run game is out of the division?

After that span in the 90's when we faced our former players at Atlanta and San Fran, each time when they returned to KILL us, that was enough for me to say I'd rather our old players go far away. Even if Tez showed up for 1 game against a division rival and suddenly gets 4 sacks, that's 4 sacks more than I want to face from a former player.

We apparently have learned our lesson and have established 2 open channels for moving and disposing of former players:

1) Miami (East coast and AFC) and
2) Oakland (West coast and AFC).

I think it's just great policy to have these channels open. Otherwise you have Atlanta or TB sitting there ready to pick off anyone and pay them 500k with the hopes they can help them steal at least 1 game from us. Just sayin.

10-23-2013, 05:35 PM	#1
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: Raiders Claim Martez Wilson Originally Posted by Halo Glad he's out of our division.... Why would you be glad a liability in the run game is out of the division?

10-23-2013, 05:38 PM	#2
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Raiders Claim Martez Wilson Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper Why would you be glad a liability in the run game is out of the division? maybe because it would be hell to have to play a player twice a year who thoroughly knows our defensive playbook...

10-23-2013, 05:54 PM	#3
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,047	Re: Raiders Claim Martez Wilson Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| maybe because it would be hell to have to play a player twice a year who thoroughly knows our defensive playbook... How is that hell? He wouldn't face our defense.

10-23-2013, 06:08 PM	#4
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Raiders Claim Martez Wilson Originally Posted by TheOak How is that hell? He wouldn't face our defense. Seriously; it's not that hard to figure out?! He can spill all his knowledge to the offense/coordinator and they can game-plan against our defense. Not to mention any knowledge about the offense(audible calls, etc...) he may have could give the defense a slight edge. Just like Fujita did with the Browns a couple of years ago...
	Last edited by \|Mitch\|; 10-23-2013 at 06:10 PM..

10-23-2013, 05:55 PM	#5
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,758	Re: Raiders Claim Martez Wilson Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| maybe because it would be hell to have to play a player twice a year who thoroughly knows our defensive playbook... True, a positively mediocre Scott Fujita gave us fits once. Never did much else though.

10-24-2013, 11:28 AM	#6
Halo Site Donor MONTHLY Join Date: May 2002 Location: New Orleans, LA Posts: 20,895 Blog Entries: 45	Re: Raiders Claim Martez Wilson Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper Why would you be glad a liability in the run game is out of the division? After that span in the 90's when we faced our former players at Atlanta and San Fran, each time when they returned to KILL us, that was enough for me to say I'd rather our old players go far away. Even if Tez showed up for 1 game against a division rival and suddenly gets 4 sacks, that's 4 sacks more than I want to face from a former player. We apparently have learned our lesson and have established 2 open channels for moving and disposing of former players: 1) Miami (East coast and AFC) and 2) Oakland (West coast and AFC). I think it's just great policy to have these channels open. Otherwise you have Atlanta or TB sitting there ready to pick off anyone and pay them 500k with the hopes they can help them steal at least 1 game from us. Just sayin.
	Like blackandgold.com on facebook follow us on Twitter Last edited by Halo; 10-24-2013 at 12:48 PM..

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/61375-raiders-claim-martez-wilson.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	10-23-2013 06:43 PM	2
Raiders Claim Martez Wilson	This thread	Refback	10-23-2013 05:00 PM	17