![]() |
Signs of Weaknres
Seattle barely winning, I see us beating them come December. No mistakes and strong dline and oline play. I hope the rest of the NFC takes notes.. I was really hoping they lost.
|
Re: Seahawks
For some reason I knew the Rams would blow it, like when they where 1st and 10 from the 5. I just knew they would blow it and said it to myself.
Seattle can be beat. They pulled a hat trick tonight which is the mark of a good team, but they're starting tackle. Regardless, the Seahags looked a mess, and I think our d line is better than the Rams. |
Re: Seahawks
That missed field goal really came back to haunt the rams. If they make that a field goal on the last drive wins it. Shows how valuable special teams can be. I just hope that game doesn't cost us home field.
|
Re: Seahawks
Too right. They can be beat. Winning against them will turn on excellent D-play and our O-Line. Really need to get it together there.
Wow, Long and Quinn put Russell on his back all night!! The Seahawks had 7 first downs to Rams 23!! And, 339 yds to Seattle's 135 yds.!!! Only 44 yards rushing!! Skittles my a$$. The Rams ran the ball well in that last drive. That last drive looked like a different two teams. In hindsight, last play should have been a run disguised as a pass. Jeff Fisher needs to rethink his play calling. I hope Sean Payton watches that game. Of course, they weren't playin' at the Link either. If Sam Bradford had been playing -- they would have won. Also, other teams could look at our game against the Bucs and say the same thing -- ok, it was raining -- but still, the Bucs at least still had their starting QB. Tell you one thing, the Hawks are fired-up. They believe and they are a family. They are goin' for it all. |
Re: Seahawks
most people dont believe and refuse to believe when I say Seattle is not great on the road.
unfortunate part about this is that Seattle has a cupcake schedule on the road where they can play badly and still win. But who knows, they could essentially still lose to Atl, NY, and SF. All I know is the one thing I do not want is for the Saints to have travel out West come playoff time. But I think I would feel more comfortable going to Seattle than to SF. I think Seattle is like the Falcons to some degree with all the smoke and mirrors. |
Re: Seahawks
Seattle's defense is night and day different between home and away and don't go forgetting that. Other than that, yes they are very beatable; as long as we shut down Lynch, which is the key to Wilsons passing predictability.
Now while everyone is still being reasonable. http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/10/29/ameva5e8.jpg |
Re: Seahawks
They are a good team, but I'm not ready to crown them or anything. Their schedule makes them look better than they are, and they have had the benefit of playing a couple of teams that were experiencing unexpected temporary meltdowns or implosions, that were unrelated to the Seahawks' play. When they line up against a real team (Indy, Houston) they don't look so invincible to me.
|
Re: Seahawks
Seattle is a different team on the road. This is why we need the #1 seed.
|
Re: Seahawks
Here are the Splits on Seattle:
5 Away Games and 3 Home Offense Home Scoring/game 31.3 Away Scoring/game 22.2 Home Passing Comp% 68.5 Away Passing Comp% 59.7 Home Yards/Game 231 Away Yards/Game 179 Home Rushing YPC 4.1 Away Rushing YPC 4.7 Defense Home Points allowed/game 11 Away Points allowed/game 18.4 Home Sacks/Game 3 Away Sacks/Game 3.4 Home Yard/game 231.6 Away Yards/game 323.8 I will frame this with they have only faces SF, Jac, Ten at home and Jacksonville put up 17 on them... Jacksonville is dead last in points scored/game @10.8 |
Re: Seahawks
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com