![]() |
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
Carolina should have lost to Miami and NE, but they didn't...so it's only fair that they got exposed in a big game that actually matters.
|
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
I agree with Rez full on about them being an incomplete defence, that secondary is bull sh*t. There's a reason Mitchell got dumped by the Raiders for a safety who's a trillion years old.
|
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
Quote:
|
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
Not particularly secondary, but I thought Kuechly was supposed to be some awesome LB in coverage? He was nowhere to be found when he dropped back in the middle, consistently abused by Colston, Moore, and Graham...
|
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
Their secondary was known for being crap. Our receivers are suspect. But, hat's off to Marques Colston tonight. Big, big game. Way to go!!
|
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
Hey, I've been saying for WEEKS that the Panthers are a good d-line+ Luke Kuechly...I think we've confirmed that's the case...
|
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
We will win home games easily, as long as we are at home in the comfy Superdome. If we go on the road, like against the Rams and Panthers next in the schedule, or if we really NEED a road win in the playoffs, on the West Coast or somewhere more hostile, well that's a different story.... Does anyone really think that we could do this same performance tonight in San Francisco, Seattle,or a raging blizzard in Philly?
|
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
I just want to share this with everyone...it's from last Monday's fallout but just enjoy it...
"I have lost all faith in this Saints team. Don't be surprised if they blow the Panthers game as well. Oh and just wait for the Rams game."-The one and only, Nola54...man, myth, legendary panty waist. |
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
Quote:
|
Re: 10-3 [We could win out :) ]
It was only an 8-game winning streak. Just sayin'. :p
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com