Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags

JayHawk777 · 01-09-2014, 08:23 PM

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint

That's true and very impressive as Zac Stacy is a heck of a running back.

Although, I gotta say, I watched the game and thought the Rams just mailed it in since they didn't have anything to play for.

But the week before, the Hawks gave up 134 yards rushing to the Arizona Cardinals in a loss. In a game that kept the Cardinals alive and could have locked up HOA for the Seahawks. I didn't get to see that game.

Well, 2 weeks prior to that, Zac ran for 130+ yds vs the Saints with a 40 yd TD burst in a game that the Rams had nothing to play for and you had everything to play for. Down 27-3 entering the 4th qtr vs STL ?

Schmohams · 01-09-2014, 08:27 PM

Originally Posted by JayHawk777

Well, 2 weeks prior to that, Zac ran for 130+ yds vs the Saints with a 40 yd TD burst in a game that the Rams had nothing to play for and you had everything to play for. Down 27-3 entering the 4th qtr vs STL ?

I see you're new to football considering Seahawk fans were established in 2012, so you probably don't get it. This is playoff football, every team starts 0-0 and works their way up. What happened in the regular season doesn't matter now.

JayHawk777 · 01-09-2014, 08:50 PM

Originally Posted by Schmohams

I see you're new to football considering Seahawk fans were established in 2012, so you probably don't get it. This is playoff football, every team starts 0-0 and works their way up. What happened in the regular season doesn't matter now.

Keep it classy, Schmoe, keep it classy.

I was simply responding to Utah about his observations that Zac seemed disinterested and if so, he should've been 2 weeks prior when Zac had a buck 30.

What happened in the regular season does matter now because had the Saints beat the Hawks, the Saints would've had the #1 seed in the NFC.

Actually, I've been a Hawk fan since Kenny Easley, arguably the greatest safety to roam a secondary, was playing in Seattle. Better than Ronnie, just had a kidney problem.

It wouldn't even surprise me if I knew more about those late 80's/early 90's Saints squads than you. That was the heyday of my football addiction. Pat Swilling and RJackson were sick.

Unfortunately, from 1984 - 1995, the NFC won all the SB's and was a tough as nails conference making it difficult for N.O. to get out of the WC round. Saints needed a better QB but the D was fierce.

I know ball. Don't ever underestimate your opponent and know thy enemy before you pop off next time.

Try to be cool. No need for disrespect. It's just a forum, schmoe.

Schmohams · 01-09-2014, 09:32 PM

Originally Posted by JayHawk777

Keep it classy, Schmoe, keep it classy.

I was simply responding to Utah about his observations that Zac seemed disinterested and if so, he should've been 2 weeks prior when Zac had a buck 30.

What happened in the regular season does matter now because had the Saints beat the Hawks, the Saints would've had the #1 seed in the NFC.

Actually, I've been a Hawk fan since Kenny Easley, arguably the greatest safety to roam a secondary, was playing in Seattle. Better than Ronnie, just had a kidney problem.

It wouldn't even surprise me if I knew more about those late 80's/early 90's Saints squads than you. That was the heyday of my football addiction. Pat Swilling and RJackson were sick.

Unfortunately, from 1984 - 1995, the NFC won all the SB's and was a tough as nails conference making it difficult for N.O. to get out of the WC round. Saints needed a better QB but the D was fierce.

I know ball. Don't ever underestimate your opponent and know thy enemy before you pop off next time.

Try to be cool. No need for disrespect. It's just a forum, schmoe.

Sorry to mistake you for the average Seahawk fan, guess you are for real. BTW, looking sharp my man(see picture below)

TheOak · 01-10-2014, 01:18 PM

Originally Posted by JayHawk777

Keep it classy, Schmoe, keep it classy.

I was simply responding to Utah about his observations that Zac seemed disinterested and if so, he should've been 2 weeks prior when Zac had a buck 30.

What happened in the regular season does matter now because had the Saints beat the Hawks, the Saints would've had the #1 seed in the NFC.

Actually, I've been a Hawk fan since Kenny Easley, arguably the greatest safety to roam a secondary, was playing in Seattle. Better than Ronnie, just had a kidney problem.

It wouldn't even surprise me if I knew more about those late 80's/early 90's Saints squads than you. That was the heyday of my football addiction. Pat Swilling and RJackson were sick.

Unfortunately, from 1984 - 1995, the NFC won all the SB's and was a tough as nails conference making it difficult for N.O. to get out of the WC round. Saints needed a better QB but the D was fierce.

I know ball. Don't ever underestimate your opponent and know thy enemy before you pop off next time.

Try to be cool. No need for disrespect. It's just a forum, schmoe.

Ok, you know ball and you know the Seahawks... What happened to your offense after you beat us?

What is with Wilsons less than 67% completion rate for the last 4 games of regular season? Is it Wilson or the receivers? He has played some abnormally poor ball in those last 4 games.

I know your o-line allowed 4 sacks each of the last 3 games. Line a liability or is Wilson holding on too long? Your Left side o-line is as bad as our Charles brown.

JayHawk777 · 01-11-2014, 11:22 AM

Originally Posted by TheOak

Ok, you know ball and you know the Seahawks... What happened to your offense after you beat us?

What is with Wilsons less than 67% completion rate for the last 4 games of regular season? Is it Wilson or the receivers? He has played some abnormally poor ball in those last 4 games.

I know your o-line allowed 4 sacks each of the last 3 games. Line a liability or is Wilson holding on too long? Your Left side o-line is as bad as our Charles brown.

The Hawks started the season with a decent receiver corp, 2's & 3's. Not having Harvin play and Rice getting injured reduced them to below avg. Rice has great hands and was a tall target.

Now we're reduced to Tate & Baldwin with Kearse being hurt. That is weak.

Our O scored 27 vs ya'll but it was more blown coverage (Zach Miller for 60 yds) and Wilson beating the blitz with a beautiful toss and over the shoulder catch by Baldwin. It was what the Saints did and didn't do but that was our O-Co's best called game of the season. Our o-co really stinks.
Poor play calling in the red zone vs the 9ers. RRP at the 13 yd line with 5 minutes left as if he wanted to settle for a fg. Same vs Zona at the goal line right before the half where we didn't get any points.

9er's, Zona, Rams knew our tendencies, stacked the box and dared our receivers to get separation.

Hawks lack weapons and reason RWilson is the X factor. Without sounding like a homer, there is only 1 guy that escapes pressure and throws on the run as well as RWilson and that's ARodgers. Kaep runs well but is a 1 read and bolt guy.

Rwilson keeps his eyes downfield and has amazing touch when running. Part of that is attributed to his large hands where he can hold the rock like a loaf of bread and deliver a bullet or release with touch at a moments notice. I expect your fans to see that later today.

The problem is avg wr's and an OL that isn't playing to their potential. RWilson is a true bad @$$ if the O-Co calls plays to suit his strengths and isn't so predictable as he's been the past month.

I'm stating the obvious here but turnovers are the #1 key and #2 is red zone efficiency.

Here's to an entertaining game!

Utah_Saint · 01-11-2014, 11:32 AM

Originally Posted by JayHawk777

RWilson is a true bad @$$

I agree with this. I think you guys have one of the best young QBs in the game. I'm looking forward to watching him play for the next 10+ years (except when he plays the Saints)

Utah_Saint · 01-09-2014, 08:54 PM

Originally Posted by JayHawk777

Well, 2 weeks prior to that, Zac ran for 130+ yds vs the Saints with a 40 yd TD burst in a game that the Rams had nothing to play for and you had everything to play for. Down 27-3 entering the 4th qtr vs STL ?

Sorry, sometimes I'm a little slow on the uptake, but I'm not seeing your point here. I already pointed out Zac Stacy was a great running back.

You posted that the Seahawks would win 30-6 if they were playing "D like this" and your only supporting fact was the Seahawks held Stacy to 15 yards rushing. I simply showed your stat was atypical. Zac also had 130+ against the Hawks, something the teams have in common. As a matter of fact, two out of the last 4 Hawks games, they've allowed over 130 yards rushing and lost both games.
Did you want to change your reasoning to the Saints defense?

View Poll Results: Predict the Score Saints vs SeaHags
Saints put up a Forty Burger on the SeaHags.	8	18.18%
Saints in a close one.	26	59.09%
SeaHags repeat performance from earlier in the season.	4	9.09%
SeaHags in a squeaker.	4	9.09%
Goes into overtime where the refs screw both both teams.	2	4.55%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

01-09-2014, 08:23 PM	#1
JayHawk777 Rookie Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 11	Re: Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags Originally Posted by Utah_Saint That's true and very impressive as Zac Stacy is a heck of a running back. Although, I gotta say, I watched the game and thought the Rams just mailed it in since they didn't have anything to play for. But the week before, the Hawks gave up 134 yards rushing to the Arizona Cardinals in a loss. In a game that kept the Cardinals alive and could have locked up HOA for the Seahawks. I didn't get to see that game. Well, 2 weeks prior to that, Zac ran for 130+ yds vs the Saints with a 40 yd TD burst in a game that the Rams had nothing to play for and you had everything to play for. Down 27-3 entering the 4th qtr vs STL ?
JayHawk777 Rookie Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 11

01-09-2014, 08:50 PM	#3
JayHawk777 Rookie Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 11	Re: Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags Originally Posted by Schmohams I see you're new to football considering Seahawk fans were established in 2012, so you probably don't get it. This is playoff football, every team starts 0-0 and works their way up. What happened in the regular season doesn't matter now. Keep it classy, Schmoe, keep it classy. I was simply responding to Utah about his observations that Zac seemed disinterested and if so, he should've been 2 weeks prior when Zac had a buck 30. What happened in the regular season does matter now because had the Saints beat the Hawks, the Saints would've had the #1 seed in the NFC. Actually, I've been a Hawk fan since Kenny Easley, arguably the greatest safety to roam a secondary, was playing in Seattle. Better than Ronnie, just had a kidney problem. It wouldn't even surprise me if I knew more about those late 80's/early 90's Saints squads than you. That was the heyday of my football addiction. Pat Swilling and RJackson were sick. Unfortunately, from 1984 - 1995, the NFC won all the SB's and was a tough as nails conference making it difficult for N.O. to get out of the WC round. Saints needed a better QB but the D was fierce. I know ball. Don't ever underestimate your opponent and know thy enemy before you pop off next time. Try to be cool. No need for disrespect. It's just a forum, schmoe. SmashMouth and bobdog86 like this.
JayHawk777 Rookie Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 11

01-09-2014, 09:32 PM	#4
Schmohams 500th Post Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Texas Posts: 551	Re: Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags Originally Posted by JayHawk777 Keep it classy, Schmoe, keep it classy. I was simply responding to Utah about his observations that Zac seemed disinterested and if so, he should've been 2 weeks prior when Zac had a buck 30. What happened in the regular season does matter now because had the Saints beat the Hawks, the Saints would've had the #1 seed in the NFC. Actually, I've been a Hawk fan since Kenny Easley, arguably the greatest safety to roam a secondary, was playing in Seattle. Better than Ronnie, just had a kidney problem. It wouldn't even surprise me if I knew more about those late 80's/early 90's Saints squads than you. That was the heyday of my football addiction. Pat Swilling and RJackson were sick. Unfortunately, from 1984 - 1995, the NFC won all the SB's and was a tough as nails conference making it difficult for N.O. to get out of the WC round. Saints needed a better QB but the D was fierce. I know ball. Don't ever underestimate your opponent and know thy enemy before you pop off next time. Try to be cool. No need for disrespect. It's just a forum, schmoe. Sorry to mistake you for the average Seahawk fan, guess you are for real. BTW, looking sharp my man(see picture below) Attached Thumbnails

01-10-2014, 01:18 PM	#5
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,051	Re: Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags Originally Posted by JayHawk777 Keep it classy, Schmoe, keep it classy. I was simply responding to Utah about his observations that Zac seemed disinterested and if so, he should've been 2 weeks prior when Zac had a buck 30. What happened in the regular season does matter now because had the Saints beat the Hawks, the Saints would've had the #1 seed in the NFC. Actually, I've been a Hawk fan since Kenny Easley, arguably the greatest safety to roam a secondary, was playing in Seattle. Better than Ronnie, just had a kidney problem. It wouldn't even surprise me if I knew more about those late 80's/early 90's Saints squads than you. That was the heyday of my football addiction. Pat Swilling and RJackson were sick. Unfortunately, from 1984 - 1995, the NFC won all the SB's and was a tough as nails conference making it difficult for N.O. to get out of the WC round. Saints needed a better QB but the D was fierce. I know ball. Don't ever underestimate your opponent and know thy enemy before you pop off next time. Try to be cool. No need for disrespect. It's just a forum, schmoe. Ok, you know ball and you know the Seahawks... What happened to your offense after you beat us? What is with Wilsons less than 67% completion rate for the last 4 games of regular season? Is it Wilson or the receivers? He has played some abnormally poor ball in those last 4 games. I know your o-line allowed 4 sacks each of the last 3 games. Line a liability or is Wilson holding on too long? Your Left side o-line is as bad as our Charles brown.

01-09-2014, 08:27 PM	#2
Schmohams 500th Post Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Texas Posts: 551	Re: Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags Originally Posted by JayHawk777 Well, 2 weeks prior to that, Zac ran for 130+ yds vs the Saints with a 40 yd TD burst in a game that the Rams had nothing to play for and you had everything to play for. Down 27-3 entering the 4th qtr vs STL ? I see you're new to football considering Seahawk fans were established in 2012, so you probably don't get it. This is playoff football, every team starts 0-0 and works their way up. What happened in the regular season doesn't matter now.

01-11-2014, 11:22 AM	#6
JayHawk777 Rookie Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 11	Re: Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags Originally Posted by TheOak Ok, you know ball and you know the Seahawks... What happened to your offense after you beat us? What is with Wilsons less than 67% completion rate for the last 4 games of regular season? Is it Wilson or the receivers? He has played some abnormally poor ball in those last 4 games. I know your o-line allowed 4 sacks each of the last 3 games. Line a liability or is Wilson holding on too long? Your Left side o-line is as bad as our Charles brown. The Hawks started the season with a decent receiver corp, 2's & 3's. Not having Harvin play and Rice getting injured reduced them to below avg. Rice has great hands and was a tall target. Now we're reduced to Tate & Baldwin with Kearse being hurt. That is weak. Our O scored 27 vs ya'll but it was more blown coverage (Zach Miller for 60 yds) and Wilson beating the blitz with a beautiful toss and over the shoulder catch by Baldwin. It was what the Saints did and didn't do but that was our O-Co's best called game of the season. Our o-co really stinks. Poor play calling in the red zone vs the 9ers. RRP at the 13 yd line with 5 minutes left as if he wanted to settle for a fg. Same vs Zona at the goal line right before the half where we didn't get any points. 9er's, Zona, Rams knew our tendencies, stacked the box and dared our receivers to get separation. Hawks lack weapons and reason RWilson is the X factor. Without sounding like a homer, there is only 1 guy that escapes pressure and throws on the run as well as RWilson and that's ARodgers. Kaep runs well but is a 1 read and bolt guy. Rwilson keeps his eyes downfield and has amazing touch when running. Part of that is attributed to his large hands where he can hold the rock like a loaf of bread and deliver a bullet or release with touch at a moments notice. I expect your fans to see that later today. The problem is avg wr's and an OL that isn't playing to their potential. RWilson is a true bad @$$ if the O-Co calls plays to suit his strengths and isn't so predictable as he's been the past month. I'm stating the obvious here but turnovers are the #1 key and #2 is red zone efficiency. Here's to an entertaining game!
JayHawk777 Rookie Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 11

01-11-2014, 11:32 AM	#7
Utah_Saint Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah Posts: 3,521	Re: Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags Originally Posted by JayHawk777 RWilson is a true bad @$$ I agree with this. I think you guys have one of the best young QBs in the game. I'm looking forward to watching him play for the next 10+ years (except when he plays the Saints)

01-09-2014, 08:54 PM	#8
Utah_Saint Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah Posts: 3,521	Re: Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags Originally Posted by JayHawk777 Well, 2 weeks prior to that, Zac ran for 130+ yds vs the Saints with a 40 yd TD burst in a game that the Rams had nothing to play for and you had everything to play for. Down 27-3 entering the 4th qtr vs STL ? Sorry, sometimes I'm a little slow on the uptake, but I'm not seeing your point here. I already pointed out Zac Stacy was a great running back. You posted that the Seahawks would win 30-6 if they were playing "D like this" and your only supporting fact was the Seahawks held Stacy to 15 yards rushing. I simply showed your stat was atypical. Zac also had 130+ against the Hawks, something the teams have in common. As a matter of fact, two out of the last 4 Hawks games, they've allowed over 130 yards rushing and lost both games. Did you want to change your reasoning to the Saints defense?

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/63650-predict-score-saints-vs-seahags.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Predict The Score Saints vs SeaHags	This thread	Refback	01-09-2014 12:05 PM	19