|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by spkb25 If we package our second round pick with 13 we could move to 6, by still having 31 that effectively still gives us a second round selection with 2 third rounders to come. I don't think ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 921
|
Re: Argument against this?
I do. Most of the talent is in rounds 2- the top of 5. We don't need to move it. Stay put and take BPA or move down and get more picks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,145
|
Re: Argument against this?
Originally Posted by NonieT
GOT YA, FROM WHAT I have read is there about 10 maybe 12 top guys and then a ton of guys with exactly the same talent level. So to me being outside that spot where the top talent is you trade up, and then you still have 2 3rds, and 31.![]()
You end up with top 6 pick, and still have 3 more in first 3. No?? |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 921
|
Re: Argument against this?
Originally Posted by spkb25
NO, NO, & NO!!!!!!!! Stay put.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/71938-argument-against.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 04-12-2015 01:40 PM | 6 |
Argument against this? | This thread | Refback | 04-12-2015 01:18 PM | 11 |