|
|||||||
Best Saints By The Numbers: 41, 42, 43, 44
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Best Saints By The Numbers: #41 Best Saints By The Numbers: #42 (although not a bad choice, we all know who would have been here and why he isn't) Best Saints By The Numbers: #43 Best Saints By The Numbers: ...
2Likes
 |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-23-2015, 06:49 AM
|
#1 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,085
|
Best Saints By The Numbers: 41, 42, 43, 44
Best Saints By The Numbers: #41
Best Saints By The Numbers: #42 (although not a bad choice, we all know who would have been here and why he isn't) Best Saints By The Numbers: #43 Best Saints By The Numbers: #44 |
|
|
07-23-2015, 03:50 PM
|
#2 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,634
|
Re: Best Saints By The Numbers: 41, 42, 43, 44
Not sure on 43. He wore it 1 year. Should have gone to Ashley Ambrose.
|
|
|
|
07-24-2015, 06:50 AM
|
#3 |
|
LB Mentallity
|
Re: Best Saints By The Numbers: 41, 42, 43, 44
42 chuck ok not my first pick either. what a talent but ......
43 McKenzie? yep 34 is more where i would go also but 34 has some seriously good players attached to it. so i give the writer credit in making sure McKenzie was on the list. |
|
|
|
07-24-2015, 10:00 AM
|
#4 |
|
100th Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: ICT Kansas
Posts: 183
|
Re: Best Saints By The Numbers: 41, 42, 43, 44
Why not go with Sproles at 43? He was fun to watch and played great.
|
|
|
|
07-24-2015, 01:00 PM
|
#5 |
|
SaintSince67
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PortCity
Posts: 2,044
|
Re: Best Saints By The Numbers: 41, 42, 43, 44
Muncie and Galbreth were amazing.
"Lightning and Thunder"! I loved Sharper, but Chuck Muncie was the Man! |
|
|
|
07-25-2015, 09:32 PM
|
#6 |
|
12,000 BS Posts
|
Re: Best Saints By The Numbers: 41, 42, 43, 44
Finally some decent players!
|
|
|
Linear Mode
