saintswhodi

People complain that almost every discussion turns into an AB thread. It's funny to me that most times when that happens, someone is trying to be crafty on a "don't look at Brooks blame someone else" kinda way. How that is supposed to NOT turn into a discussion with Brooks included is beyond me. If you are discussing O-line, who are they blocking for, the Pope? If you are discussing dropped passes, who is throwing the ball, President Bush? We need some semblance of reality here. But here's the thing, if we are gonna say "If the discussion does not include AB, don't bring him into it, " fine. Let's do that. But if there is an AB thread, don't bring in the dropped passes and o-line, and defense or ANYTHING ELSE BUT AB. Seem fair to everyone? Or not? Can this be done? I doubt it. Cause there are those who want AB blamed for NOTHING, and there are those who after 4 years are tired of the excuses and want something different. Seems like Repubs and Dems to me, thay aren't ever gonna merge into one party. So what say the BNG faithful? Ab discussions with no mention of any other part of the team, and discussions of other parts of the team and no AB? Seem Fair? Possible? Holla.