another i cant hepp it thread
 

i am so pathetic i read other teams message boards and their newspaper forums. some of you might get a chuckle from some of this thread i found in the miami herald-

know that this post may be a little "out there" but I was thinking of bad teams that had good QB's and the possibility they would want to trade for Surtain, any possibility the Saints would be interested in trading Aaron Brooks??? The Saints corners have been terrible for years and I was recalling how they made a major transition when they released both Sammy Knight and traded Laroi Glover...they seem like a team that is comfortable with drastic transition so maybe they would be okay with trading Brooks.
------
i wouldnt trade Surtain for Brooks. he is too inconsistent
------
That is such a bad idea. Brooks not very consistent plus he has not shown that ability to win games when they are on the line and that is in a system that he is very familiary with and with a lot of talent on offense. Trading away Surtain for him does not make sense. Based on Surtains value you either need to get top notch starter at a position or good picks
------
I dont care about Brooks contract status, there is no way I would trade Surtain for him. You might as well give Surtain away if you are going to do that. Remember, Aaron Brooks, the same guy that spun around and threw a pass to guy behind him, only to realize it was an offensive lineman. Luckily the Saints recovered the "fumble", I think they only lost about 25 yards on the play.
------
NOT A CHANCE IN HELL
------
Aaron Brooks is as dumb as a box of rocks! No way!!
------
Bad trade!!!! Brooks is not a winner. he puts up nice numbers but chokes in big spots. That would be a horrible trade.
------
I wouldn't trade Surtain's soiled jockstrap for Brooks
------

another i cant hepp it thread
 

Now THAT IS HILARIOUS!!!! :rollinglaugh: I have said numerous times some members would be laughed off another forum the way they defend Brooks and criticize other established QBs. Case in point right there. I have often offered to post polls on other forums about Brooks and other QBs, but no takers. I guess we can see why. MIAMI FANS scoff at taking Brooks for a player who is being shopped around? Aren\'t they picking SECOND in the draft? That is priceless. Nice, nice find.

another i cant hepp it thread
 

Just curious, though. Did you include all of the comments, or just the negative ones? I am not trying to defend AB here but am just curious if there were any takers.

another i cant hepp it thread
 

Gatorman, :xxrotflmao:

Good point LB. I am curious to know if ANYONE thought it was a good idea.

another i cant hepp it thread
 

:fanclub: :rollinglaugh: :dancingmonkey: :roll: :lol: :crowd:

another i cant hepp it thread
 

no, there were no positive ones, just some that rambled about his status thinking he was a free agent is why i didnt post those.

another i cant hepp it thread
 

Priceless.

another i cant hepp it thread
 

Ask them if they would trade 3rd rounder for Brooks. You guys who want to get rid of Brooks seem to think we can get that or more in a trade for Brooks. It seems that is false too.

Furthermore, people acknowledge Brooks\' bad play here, including all those things that the MIA fans noted. I don\'t see how this is any sort of victory for the get rid of Brooks gang.

If anything, this shows we won\'t get good value for him on the market. This is reason to keep him.

another i cant hepp it thread
 

I think the point is that a team who has a WORSE QB situation than us and a WORSE record has fans who LAUGH at the possibility of attaining a QB who has started the last 4 years for our team and is free of blame by some. If the ringing endorsement to keep him is because EVERYONE in the league can see he is not worth much, how much of an endorsement is that? That\'s downright terrible. We might as well have Luke McCown or Ken Dorsey. I don\'t think they would draw must interest around the league either.

another i cant hepp it thread
 

You need to drop this. There is no such person who thinks that.