![]() |
I don't want Rankins!
I really hope that is not the first pick.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
He would fit a need. He is supposedly the best DT/NT prospect not name Nkemdiche.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
He's one of my favorites at 12
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
I could live with it. Nick Fairley is the only 3-technique we currently have. Plus, Rankins played the 5-technique at Louisville so he brings versatility. It wouldn't ruin my night but I'd prefer to land an edge rusher.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Who is BPA between him, Lawson, Conklin, and Jackson? Since those will be the best DT, DE, OT, and CB available.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Quote:
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Lawson was it for a while, I'm recently wanting Jackson more for secondary concerns.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
PREDICTION - GIVEN... SAINTS DON'T KNOW HOW TO DRAFT DEFENSE.
#1 - WR - LAQUON TREADWELL OLD MISS 100% Approved by Puzzies. https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-S...ance-party.gif |
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Quote:
I agree. He disappears a lot. Reminds me of Ellis. |
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Quote:
Rankins didn't flash until the Senior Bowl(s);he's only 6'; big guards will stack and pack his arse; it's going to be Sedrick Ellis all over again... Shaq Lawson? Have a five tech in C. Jordan, we need more of a bigger end (3/4 T) opposite Cam to set that edge and contain, collapse the pocket; Lawson's too small to get it done... Will Jackson, impressive cornerback; but they're others in the second, third round who probably need less than a season (So. Miss CB Kalan Reed); plus what we've got already... Conklin represents the best value of the group, but Treadwell is the guy I want in Payton's offense - Jerry 2.0 |
Re: I don't want Rankins!
I don't like Rankin's either. They are useless. Let's pick guys who produce, and let the experts say what they want.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Quote:
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Quote:
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Quote:
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Ezekiel Elliott RB OSU 5115 225 4.47
Best all around back in the past few years that fits SP game plan to a Tee. Jarran Reed, DT/DE, Alabama 6034 307 4.25 I want a run stuffer that eats up O lineman and spit them out. One with the ability to stop the run and stay on the field all 3 downs. In pass rush he push O linemean all around collapsing the middle of the pocket taking that step up away and letting the DE do there thing. 43 or 34 or anything you can dream of. he is the guy. he is the best NT in the draft. DT? plenty to be had Shaq Lawson DE Clemson 6026 270 4.70 Lawson i love the run support is there already and still learning to pass rush. He is a strong side DE with plenty of upside Josh Doctson WR TCU 6030 202 4.50 Might be the best WR Laquon Treadwell WR Mississippi 6020 221 4.65 But a big strong woobie blanket for drew is cool too. Those are my impact players for the saints Still think Ramesy might fall. I love the kids upside but top ten? much less top 5. when was the last time you saw a DB go this high that never player the same position in 3 years at college? Stanely is my OL man round 1. Conklin is Peat with an attitude. which is not bad |
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Sorry Will.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Hope this is not Sed Ellis 2.0
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Titans jump way up for the best lineman in the draft.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
I dont see why everyone is talking about Ellis. The similarities are suze. Ellis obviously didn't love football or he wouldn't be three years into retirement at 30. He hot paid big and early,won a superbowl amd retired at 27
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Quote:
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
well he is a saints now so prove me wrong.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
He's the second coming of Aaron Donald*
*until he oroves not to be |
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Quote:
He is not near as fast, quick nor is he near as strong. so be careful lol If he put up those type of numbers I would not be saying a thing |
Re: I don't want Rankins!
What is funny a lot of people saying who we should have taken or hoped we got and then look at who is still on the board of lot of there players have fallen and not even dropping out of round 1.
I like the pick, not in love with it but I like it. HIGH MOTOR GUY, NEVER GIVES UP. HUGE WORK ETHIC... |
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Quote:
What I heard about him is that he's really quick. I think Mayock also said he's one of the quickest DT's to come out in the last few years. I think the only thing Donald has on him, from a measurable standpoint, is strength. Not that he's weak at all, but he's probably going to need to beef up a little. I like his explosiveness. I just hope it translates well to the next level. |
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Should have gone with the "Stud" Kicker!
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Hilarious title. Karma got ya.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
I don't know a ton about him but he fills a glaring need. I would actually like to see us now keep addressing this position with our next pick and get Reed or Robinson. Rankins, Fairley, Davison, Jenkins and one more high value DT would make a solid rotation. If we can control the line of scrimmage I think we can fabricate pass rush in other ways.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
I do believe he'll look gold in black and gold.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
Im good with this pick....need someone who can create pressure up the middle. DT is deep this year...especially space eaters. I still hope we get a pass rusher or even D. Jones from LSU because we need speed in the front 7.
|
Re: I don't want Rankins!
I'm thinking the kid will do good. He can play multiple positions and an EX GM says that the fact he's a "Boring Player" is the best kind of player. No player is without faults, I just hope our Coaching Staff can Coach the kid up like Cam Jordan has been Coached Up.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com