The Big Picture.

JKool · 03-07-2005, 04:14 PM

So far,

(1) Not bad for a FO with no plan...

(2) I really feel like we should get a vetran LB to play with our rookies.
(3) I really like the idea of trading down in the first and adding a second. Other than a few DTs and maybe T. Davis, I don\'t think that there will be serious impact players at #16. We can move down and maybe still get Davis or a DT. We can then pick up two players in round two - I actually like the idea of taking two of those \"solid\" LBs here.
(4) I think we should still pursue a real RT and a CB (even if just to play nickle) in FA.

This way, we get two new \"solid\" LBs in the draft. A potential impact DT (like Hawthorne or Cody). A real RT, a CB (I like Dyson, but I don\'t think we\'ll get him), and hopefully a stud LB with a Howard trade or a Witherspoon or Hartwell.

Damn, wouldn\'t that be fine?

03-07-2005, 04:14 PM	#9
JKool 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 2,423	The Big Picture. So far, (1) Not bad for a FO with no plan... (2) I really feel like we should get a vetran LB to play with our rookies. (3) I really like the idea of trading down in the first and adding a second. Other than a few DTs and maybe T. Davis, I don\'t think that there will be serious impact players at #16. We can move down and maybe still get Davis or a DT. We can then pick up two players in round two - I actually like the idea of taking two of those \"solid\" LBs here. (4) I think we should still pursue a real RT and a CB (even if just to play nickle) in FA. This way, we get two new \"solid\" LBs in the draft. A potential impact DT (like Hawthorne or Cody). A real RT, a CB (I like Dyson, but I don\'t think we\'ll get him), and hopefully a stud LB with a Howard trade or a Witherspoon or Hartwell. Damn, wouldn\'t that be fine?
	"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks